Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - In the case lower connections not rendundant

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  d on January 09, 2002 at 21:42:01:

In Reply to:  SurePlate steel building connections WTC?? posted by JWmHarmon on January 08, 2002 at 10:45:35:


Noting that some comments questioned why or whether the lower chord attachments of the trusses were necessary to the tower, I returned to look at Ngon Nguyen's posts from last September and October. He seems to make a case that the VE attachment also served to transmit some vertical loads, I believe, and thus was not redundant. On this premise, I went back to sketching a new scenario:
In (1) two floors w. trusses are shown, w. VEDs (A), as fuel spreads across floor and collects against wall.
In (2) the ignited fuel quickly goes up wall and burns through
the VED adhesive at (B). This causes sagging of truss and cracking of concrete membrane.
In (3) truss falls further and fractured concrete falls to lower
floor, breaking it, and so forth...
 

 

 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

SPECIAL THANKS TO SUSTAINING SUBSCRIBERS BUILDERSPACE.COM and Building Design News UK

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/12184.html