Re: Off by 10x - Architecture Forum

Posted by Kevin Matthews on March 30, 2002 at 20:51:52:
In Reply to: OFF by 10x posted by Yoshi on March 30, 2002 at 16:15:27:
Good point! And losing the extra zero would save 767s from trying to take with more than twice their total max. weight in fuel alone.
Story corrected.

Boeing 767 technical specifications

ArchitectureWeek Search Buildings Architects Types Places Pix Free 3D Models Store Library

Responses:

Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:

This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.
To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:
1) Go to the new forums area.
2) Register with a valid email address.
3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
4) Then login to the new forum system.

Special thanks to Sustaining Subscribers Building Design News UK, www.buildingdesign-recruitment.co.uk and www.buildingdesign-tenders.co.uk,
www.construction-index.com, www.beesker.com and BuilderSpace.com

This document is provided for on-line viewing only.

/discussion/17404.html

Design Community Architecture Discussion
Message - Re: Off by 10x
Responses \| Architecture Forum \| Architecture Students \| Architecture Scrapbook \| ArchitectureWeek