Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Critique of the Critique

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Paul Malo on June 05, 2002 at 09:04:40:

In Reply to:  ArchWeek - Reevaluating Postmodernism posted by Kevin Matthews on June 05, 2002 at 01:09:18:

Here we have a specimen of architectural journalism. Were I to succumb to the same logic of the author, I might paraphrase her assertion:

"And now that postmodernism seems to have largely died out, the building illustrates the movement's inadequacies all the more eloquently."

I might suggest that this piece represents general failings of architectural journalism--which is to say, of architectural criticism penned by non-architects.

In short, the critical flaw here is arguing from the particular to the general, supposing that whatever flaws may be evident in the example may be assigned to a larger category--in this instance, to "postmodernism," whatever thay may be.

There is a place, surely, for performance evaluation, and we architects ought to hear what users have to say. But the faults of one work ought not (as Kevin has said, as I recall) "to tar everyone with the same brush."

As observed previously, there needs to be more investigative reporting in architectural journalism--which means digging into the substantial facts involved. While I was remote from this project, which happened twenty years ago, my recollection was that Graves was largely a costumer, dressing up a highly efficient box of useable space. Even at the time there was criticism that this was mere "styling," superficial packagaing.

Yet the retrospective account does recognize this fact, but rather suggests that the genesis of the design was merely some sort of Postmodern agenda. This was a cheap building, recognized as such when built, and Portland can't blame that entirely on the architect who tried to dress it up, making someting visually tolerable of a dumb chunk of minimally enclosed space.

Criticism ought to go beyond opinions and dig into the historical facts of the project. Why was this such a cheap building? What was the scenario of its design and construction? I suspect there's much more to this story.


 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com,
, and offering jacuzzi tubs, logo items, and baby furniture.

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/19329.html