Re: THE MISSING AMERICAN SENSE OF HISTORY?

Posted by bsp on June 29, 2002 at 06:39:05:
In Reply to: Re: THE MISSING AMERICAN SENSE OF HISTORY? posted by mdp (for it is he!) on June 29, 2002 at 01:26:14:
so do you intentionally change the subject any time you reply to anything?
why does hiroshima and nakasaki have to do with anything? (it's almost as far fetched as when you sarted talking about coventry) was this a post entitled "worst/most important event ever"?
my comments were to try to enlighten you on why you might see a disproportionate amount of media attention of the WTC, since you apparently hadn't made the obvious connection.
I directly replied to your statements. you haven't directly replied to mine. and if that is the best you can come up with, then don't bother. it's a bit hard to tell if it's because you aren't capable of putting together a response that addresses any actual points made (or even makes sense as a sequence of sentences), or if it's because you weren't capable of understanding those points in the first place.

ArchitectureWeek Search Buildings Architects Types Places Pix Free 3D Models Store Library

Please follow up at our Fireside Forum

Design Community Architecture Discussion
Message - Re: THE MISSING AMERICAN SENSE OF HISTORY?
Responses \| Architecture Forum \| Architecture Students \| Architecture Scrapbook \| ArchitectureWeek