Message - Re: Future High Rise Design: More Concrete

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    

Posted by  Paul Malo on September 19, 2002 at 07:01:00:

In Reply to:  Re: Future High Rise Design: More Concrete posted by d on September 19, 2002 at 06:35:14:

Good observation. Per's system seems to be unconcerned with gravity and does remind me of projects done by a colleague, the late Prof. Jim Fitzgibbon, for NASA--weightless sturctures to float in space.

As often pointed out, Per's system is homogenous, with every segment like every other, whereas in gravitational conditions loads accumulate, requiring some portions to be stronger (larger) than others. Efficiency require loads to be carried to the ground by the most direct route possible--which is hardly Per's way of doing it!

Per seems to suppose that so long as the assemblage is rigid and will hold together, it shows promise. That doesn't make it efficient, however, and this sort of unmodulated system would be extravagantly overstructured and inefficient.

ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search


Post a Response -



This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.


Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/21839.html