Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Re: Future High Rise Design: More Concrete

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Paul Malo on September 19, 2002 at 11:11:52:

In Reply to:  Re: Future High Rise Design: More Concrete posted by d on September 19, 2002 at 10:51:12:

I don't think the “Vierendiel” principle was involved. That, of course, is simply the rigid frame with strenthened corners substituting for diangonals. I confess I don't understant the WTC principle fully, but suppose that the tube of the outer shell itself, so some degree (since the towers were fairly narrow) plus the core were intended to resist horizontal forces. But the floor trusses, I suppose, were not designed as rigid frames but as simple beams with (in effect) pin connections, as the dampers seem to suggest.

Your other point is well taken, however. We do tend to regard diagonals and odd angular forms as "agitated," rather than serene. You don't have to be Japanese to prefer serenity.

 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/21851.html