Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Re: a myth or a prophecy!

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Per Corell on October 06, 2002 at 04:21:32:

In Reply to:  Re: a myth or a prophecy! posted by BRUTUS on October 06, 2002 at 03:44:49:

Hi.
Please do so visions grow nice with candle lights and red wine :))
But you think everything is so complex but it is not, only problem for most is, that you can only "se" what you know you only know what you can understand or feel.
Problem today is, that most people think this new technology are very complex where it is not. Now this is easy for me to say, but forinstance with my frameworks people think you draw each and every frame and that this must be hell of a job, and with the troubles in tradisional technikes noone dare draw a complete structural framework intergrated with another one in a different scale, --- but this is not how it work ; the idear behind are very easily understood and by just a push to a button you have the intire framework generated ,ready to post to a 2D N.C. cutter , and you don't need to worry if it will work or not , as you _don't_ draw each and every frame, all you do is to determine the scale of the framework and then it's there and it simply can not "be there" ,unless you can produce it as you can't place anything like this on a screen unless it can be produced.
Maby this is the difference, that with a computer and a frame generator , you can't be wrong but with a piece of paper and a pen you can draw buldings that you can not build ; guess this make new technology different from Eschers works, that no illution is possible and with a push on a button you can generate what seem to be complex structures, that when you investigate the idears behind ,show very simple.
If they had had same idear about cars we still would have huge problems with horses. We still would have used flint as making steel would be "to complex" a process ; one difficult to understand and therefore impossible.
Now please exchouse that while you have a nice day, I get frustrated about architects ;))

No new technology don't need to be difficult to understand, you just need to try it. So please don't send it to hell, as this was not what it was intended to promote, what's wrong pressing a button and have the intire structural framework for your personal heaven at a third the cost, four times as strong and a tenth the job projecting.

 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/22336.html