Message - Re: DON'T READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!-Preferences modern vs traditional

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    

Posted by  BRUTUS on October 21, 2002 at 00:32:13:

In Reply to:  Re: DON'T READ THIS !!!!!!!!!!-Preferences modern vs traditional posted by JWmHarmon on October 20, 2002 at 21:16:42:

...if the building works for its intended purpose....does it matter whether it is....deconstructivist....

what is the REAL (intention+ purpose) for the supreme Decon's Gods! hypnosis....avant-gardism....spatial deconstruction....showmanship....virtual reality.....egocentrism....the
legendary "fifth" dimension and the "seventh" leave a pseudo- impression that the decon's pantheon is thinking beyond the "box" and above the boring conventional....beyond the horizon....creating the unthinkable.... globalized galactical imperial freedom of artistic contemporary postmodernistic choices!!

can we describe the scene as:

preferences modern vs traditional

architectural mutants vs naive boxes and Legos

artistical creativity vs traditions slavery

new millennium -space age technology vs stone age primitivism

do we have a legitimate case of "polarities" here?

ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search


Post a Response -



This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.


Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/22756.html