Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Re: Structural engineering of the Great Pyramid of Egypt

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Manuel Oliveros on January 01, 2003 at 09:58:51:

In Reply to:  Re: Structural engineering of the Great Pyramid of Egypt posted by Manuel Oliveros on January 01, 2003 at 09:52:05:

The scheme described above is only to the purpose of dealing with the question placed.

Structurally any pyramid shape made of discrete blocks of stone is likely to generate some arch action by itself. This arch action then will have some horizontal stresses at the central vertical axis be compression, hence denying the general scheme above, i.e. the scheme above is likely under the levels in which the compression generated by the arch action are overcome. The arch action shows however the edge of the square spreading, and this tension is akin to that described in my above entry, trying to generate a vertical hole at the central vertical axis, and to which any built-in crack (room) would be sensitive.

 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/24555.html