Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Re: Would appreciate feedback on my WTC site idea

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Per Corell on January 16, 2003 at 13:39:42:

In Reply to:  Re: Would appreciate feedback on my WTC site idea posted by d on January 16, 2003 at 12:18:38:

Hi
My critic is, that you still build monolits, Now thinking in negative spaces, is not just doing build arounds at the site. The structurs , buildings ,walls whatever that then fill the spaces are a very flexible structure in the sense of continiously being assembled into whatever form better , ------- then if you don't get challanced ,when I ask if you can do this with your two bare feets, I must still say, that I think that with negative volumes, these must be the important issue ; I do not think the sites must have a spetacular but rather a natural expression. as printet with halve each lost building, into a structure behind, you work with the true negative impac ,this can not be restricted to the site or if it is, the structure must be able to grow anyway.

 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/24889.html