Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Re: WTC Design Competition Results (IMHO)

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Edsel Condez on February 04, 2003 at 19:30:26:

In Reply to:  ArchWeek - WTC Design Competition Results posted by Kevin Matthews on January 03, 2003 at 01:49:03:

i would just like to say that people shouldn't be afraid to build and inhabit thick, tall, office towers. given the two finalist proposals, the ones with symbolic tall structures that serve no practical purpose other than being a memorial, it is clear that people want to "heal the skyline" while at the same time back away from the idea of tall office towers.

there's nothing wrong with building massive towers again, but in lieu of the way the twin towers were destroyed, some adjustments should be made (if a tall building were to be made again)to give its future inhabitants comfort. 1) provide everyone with PARACHUTES and 2) install GUN BATTERIES on the top.

these measures would be for psychological comfort only, for there is no real defense against some of the worst weapons terrorists can use (atomic weaponry).

 
 
ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/25286.html