Message - Re: Recreate architects' works - your opinion?

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    

Posted by  Richard Haut on February 21, 2003 at 04:28:10:

In Reply to:  Re: Recreate architects' works - your opinion? posted by d on February 20, 2003 at 16:40:23:

isn't it the difference between conservation and pastiche ?

to conserve, or to have appropriate buildings, is logical, but certainly in an example like Port Grimaud, it was completely new but pretended to be what it is not: old. The result is a rather blank stage-set look which gives a feeling of "fake".

it is rather like plastic surgery. For people who have been in accidents, then it is a very important discipline (the architectural equivalent perhaps being many of the eastern European town centres rebuilt after WWII), as distinct from those who have surgery to give a fake image of youth or beauty and which in many cases merely results in an impression of being characterless.

ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Free 3D Models     Store     Library

Search by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search


Post a Response -



This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.


Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/25663.html