Message - Re: theories in architecture

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    

Posted by  Per Corell on September 16, 2003 at 13:32:09:

In Reply to:  Re: theories in architecture posted by aaron on September 16, 2003 at 10:42:18:

This is why it is so nice to se a building as a structure, as then there will be a system, an idear an interconnecting system and it's not Lego.
Today we shuld make today's architecture, not the houses they had mashines to produce materials for, with the Roman times. Just to point to Pyramides I find wierd ; havn't they already showed to be the most useless architectural "structure" ; you Romans don't know how they are made, it is a structure easy to ecape but you can not enter , then why do you keep talking rebuilding a new, exactly alike, when the old proved wrong.
Architecture critics proberly rather have an architecture cheared up with feathers and gold dust, maby architects shuld be glad that the real builders is engineers not arts critics.

ArchitectureWeek     Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Search
Library     Places     Building Photos     Free 3D Models     Archiplanet

Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"
Advanced Search

Post a Response -


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.

Architecture Forum | Students Forum | Scrapbook | Home Design | 3D Gallery | E-Design

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only.