Posted by  Manuel Oliveros on July 18, 2001 at 13:18:23:

In Reply to:  power of size in the city posted by eli on July 18, 2001 at 12:14:34:

I think not in two senses: in cash flow the amount given to advertising is surely lower than that given to construction, and also, architecture itself has been as much something useful than an ad itself of civilization; and one thing can't be bigger than itself.

Responses:

• Re: power of size in the city Richard Haut 13:48:47 7/18/2001 (7)
  • Re: power of size in the city Manuel Oliveros 09:31:31 7/19/2001 (6)
    • Re: power of size in the city Richard Haut 10:01:02 7/19/2001 (4)
      • Re: power of size in the city Roger Emmerson 06:44:51 7/21/2001 (1)
        • Re: power of size in the city Richard Haut 06:11:00 7/22/2001 (0)
      • Re: power of size in the city Eli 10:09:26 7/19/2001 (1)
        • Re: power of size in the city Richard Haut 12:17:27 7/19/2001 (0)
    • Re: where can be read can't be as... Manuel Oliveros 09:33:57 7/19/2001 (0)

Post a Response -