Posted by Rashi on July 23, 2001 at 23:16:09:
"The Moghul Emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal
built the Taj Mahal. It was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653) by 20,000
artisans brought to India from all over the world. Many people
believe Ustad Isa of Iran designed it." This is what your guide probably
told you if you ever visited the Taj Mahal.This is the same story I read in my history book as a student in India.
Professor P.N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story,Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz Mahal's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the course of his research, Oak discovered the Shiva temple palace wasusurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. Shah Jahan then remodeled the palace into his wife's memorial. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz's burial.The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two
orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured
temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty
was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun, Akbar,
Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions.Oak's inquiries begin with the name Taj Mahal. He says this term does
not occur in any Moghul court papers or chronicles, even after Shah
Jahan's time. The term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any
of the Muslim countries, from Afghanistan to Algeria. "The unusual
explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal is
illogical in at least two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz
Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes. "Secondly, one cannot omit the
first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as
the name for the building." Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version
of Tejo-Mahalaya, or the Shiva's Palace. Oak also says the love story of
Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created court sycophants,
blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal
chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal
predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple palace dedicated to Shiva
worshipped by the Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Professor Marvin
Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the
Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than
Shah Jahan.European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638(only
seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his
memoirs.
But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of
Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death,
also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building long well before Shah
Jahan's time. Oak points out a number of design and architectural
inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical
Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have
remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time, and are still inaccessible to
the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Shiva and
other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples.
Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have
Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian
publisher of the first edition with dire consequences. There is only one
way to discredit or validate Oak's research. The current Indian
government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under UN
|
Search
ArchWeek
Buildings
Architects
Types
Places
Pix
Free 3D Models
Store
Library
|