Design 
  Community 
  Architecture 
  Discussion 
 

Message - Re: If not here, where? (2)

    Responses | Architecture Forum | Architecture Students | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek    
   

Posted by  Manuel Oliveros on September 18, 2001 at 14:08:54:

In Reply to:  Re: If not here, where? (2) posted by Richard Haut on September 18, 2001 at 12:13:15:

WTC was big and GREAT architecture of the typology kind. That their flaws be cause for furthening better design will be one further service by them provided. They were the top and hence experimental and were for some purposes the pride of NY, America and many humans that appreciate the great accomplishments of humankind. No imperfection in them diminish that. That imperfections or weaknesses they have shown, all have.

So I, and of course giving them less value than a single life, I will miss them if not of course as the best buildings ever, as some good ones.

 
 
Search      ArchWeek      Buildings      Architects      Types      Places      Pix      Free 3D Models      Store      Library

Search GreatBuildings.com by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search

Responses:




Post a Response -

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:


This is an archive page. Please post continuing discussion to the new Architecture Forums.

To post successfully to the new membership-based DesignCommunity Forums:

    1) Go to the new forums area.
    2) Register with a valid email address.
    3) Receive and respond to the confirmation email.
    4) Then login to the new forum system.



 

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including BuilderSpace.com,
, and offering jacuzzi tubs, logo items, and baby furniture.

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Support | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /discussion/7103.html