double wall construction techniques

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Architecture Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
birgco



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:58 pm    Post subject: double wall construction techniques Reply with quoteFind all posts by birgco

I read with interest the topic of double wall construction in march 06 or thereabouts. I built a double insulated wall system for a my current home about 7 years ago and was quite happy with the results (approx. 50 % reduction in heating / cooling costs from standard 2 x 6 new construction. Some one commented about the cost of such a system and if it was worth it. I am planning to build another home this fall, and believe the previous method I used, ( 5/8 cdx ply with house wrap, 2 x 6 exterior wall with r-19 fiberglass, 1 inch air space, 2 x 4 inner wall with r-11 / foiled faced vapor barrier ) worked well, but I believe this system could be improved by installing a 1 inch foil foam board in place of the 1 inch air space and then installing unfaced r-13 in the 2x4 non bearing stud wall. Btw, I expect to use cotton insulation in place of the fiberglass with the hope of greatly improving the quality of the installation because of the non-toxic nature of the cotton insulation. Would be interested in your comments. thanks.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
JWmHarmon



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 115
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 6:25 pm    Post subject: Compare double wall to SIPs Reply with quoteFind all posts by JWmHarmon

Have you considered using Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) instead of conventional stick framing with 2X6 and 2X4 lumber? SIPs have a core of foam insulation between a sandwich of osb (oriented strand board).

You might want to compare the cost of this type of construction with what you did before or are planning now. You would have to include the labor factor since the labor to construct and insulate with fiberglass batt insulation may be more than the extra cost of the SIPs.

I also vaguely recall when double-wall construction was first being considered back in the 20th century "energy crisis" days, that some houses were built with trusses placed vertically to increase the depth of the wall to allow for more insulation. I don't know if a product like Trus-Joists could be adapted for this purpose, but it might be worth investigating.

After viewing tornado damage over the years, I wonder if using a trussed wall system integrally connected to the roof trusses might stand up to tornadic winds? Any engineers out there looking for a challenge?

I note that sports cars are designed to withstand 200 mile per hour winds when they are driven. Big-rig trucks can withstand 100 mile per hour winds without damage. Modular homes transported over the highways typically can withstand hurricane force winds without damage. Why can we not design houses to withstand hurricanes or tornados?

_________________
When building or manufacturing always ask, "How will we recycle that?" - JWmHarmon
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
JWmHarmon



Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 115
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:09 pm    Post subject: Larsen truss wall construction & Swelite site Reply with quoteFind all posts by JWmHarmon

A little googling produced the name Larsen truss wall

http://www.greenfret.com/house/larsen.html

Also, a complete truss-built house components site gives some usefull photos.

http://www.swelite.com/

I am not affiliated with these products in any way.

Another idea from way back when... why not build with a double wall with enough space to walk through? This space would act as a buffer between the outside and the inside and could be ventilated or heated as needed, keeping the inside comfortable. This is the same basic principle as putting continuous closets around the outside walls of the house. Continuos closets on the outside walls provide and additional layer to buffer the temperature extremes.[/url]

_________________
When building or manufacturing always ask, "How will we recycle that?" - JWmHarmon
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
birgco



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 6:15 am    Post subject: double wall construction techniques Reply with quoteFind all posts by birgco

Thanks for the feedback, I had considered SIPs at one time but I didn't know if the OSB was a good idea because of potential outgassing. My concerns may have been overstated. Also, do SIP's lend themselves to custom-type construction techniques. I will talk to a manufacturer to address these questions. Because I frame the walls myself, I wasn't as concerned with labor type costs and the additional 2x4's and insulation costs were not substantial. My preference for the double-wall system revolves around its ability to almost total isolate the electrical and plumbing roughing in the inner, non-structural, (2x4) wall, leaving a totally insulated and sealed 2 x 6 (exterior structural) cavity. My primary interest was the vapor barrier location and if someone had used the 1 inch foil foam board in-between the two walls. Also, I wanted to know if anyone had any experience with the new cotton roll insulation. Thanks again for your interest.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
harrysoe



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 11:28 pm    Post subject: Doublewall construction techniques Reply with quoteFind all posts by harrysoe

If you are looking for a 'green type" product for insulation, you may want to have a look at a NOP ( Natural Oil Product ) based polyol that will give you a rigid type polyurethane ( PU ) at this website:http://www.maskini.com.my[url]
The company seems to have experience in producing various products/ system using the technology. I am myself considering their product / system for my own house as a retrofit
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
mx2
millennium club


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 1968
Location: Miami, Florida

PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by mx2

Quote:
I wasn't as concerned with labor type costs and the additional 2x4's and insulation costs were not substantial.


Well, that answers a lot of questions and gives the answer to the comment about value of the system...the issue of "was it worth it". You nailed all the cost factors and if they are not an issue then of course it is very much worth it. But typically, which this is not, contracted builders will cost the client far more money, particularly on larger projects, when adding up labor, additional framing and insulation. I would never be able to sell your system to any of our clients...they'd think we were smoking something funny... Cool But in general, increasing your insulation is a good thing...however,...

Quote:
My preference for the double-wall system revolves around its ability to almost total isolate the electrical and plumbing roughing in the inner, non-structural, (2x4) wall, leaving a totally insulated and sealed 2 x 6 (exterior structural) cavity. My primary interest was the vapor barrier location and if someone had used the 1 inch foil foam board in-between the two walls. Also, I wanted to know if anyone had any experience with the new cotton roll insulation. Thanks again for your interest.


Historically, the cavity walls served as insulating walls...two brick walls with air space in between, propped up together with ties every so often. The moisture control was often left to some form of a weephole and that was that...but then again, air conditioning was not available and orientation towards wayward winds/sun was fundamental to cooling/heating. Nowadays, cavity walls have become a choice of material and technology for some purpose other than simply basic insulation, as noted by your desire to "isolate" your conduit and piping. Although this is generally a good idea make sure that there are no issue with eletrical and the highly condusive foil of the insulation. We don't want someone drilling through the wall and getting zapped! And overall, there are other options to running conduit through walls. That said, back to the insulation issue, the fact is that the value of the air space cannot be undermined by sandwiching material between stud walls, in lieu of the air space. The R-value is calculated basically on the ability of the material to absorb and radiate heat, as opposed to reflecting heat and how fast of a rate to transfer the heat. The air space will not transfer the heat of the exterior wall to the interior wall as quickly as adding material, even insulating material, but by how much is something that would need to be calculated and a total R-value defined. But I would rather look into the concept of venting the air space rather than filling it. The more quickly the air space can transfer the heat gain to somewhere outside the better the overall insulation. Anyway, my two cents...hope it helps somehow.

mx2.5

All that said, I have had to do pretty much what you described a few times for my clients simply out of lack of space in various locations and attaching rigid insulation to framing is better than not having any insulation, and 3 layers of different insulation should give exterior heat a lot of trouble getting thru but it's not a very effecient system, I guess is what the point is. Essentially what you're heading towards is a double cavity wall system... which is not common but not unheard of either. But I would strongly recommend you leave a 2" minimum air gap between two wall systems. In other words, if your truly gung-ho about adding another interior layer of 1" foil-backed (phenolic?) rigid insulation than add it to the "air side" of the interior wall...just make sure you figure out which way the foil side faces...

_________________
*Art of Architecture: The conscious use of skill and creative imagination in the production of an aesthetic building.
*Science of Architecture: The calculated use of technical skill and knowledge in the construction of a functional building.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
birgco



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 8:09 pm    Post subject: double wall construction technique Reply with quoteFind all posts by birgco

thank you for your comments. It's not that I am totally go-hung on the 1 inch foil board between the 2 x 6 (exterior) and 2 x 4 (interior wall). It's more to the point that I am looking for an optimum energy efficient wall system that pays for itself over a certain number of years (10 let's say), is a model of good construction, insulation, vapor barrier technique, isolates systems roughing from air penetration in the exterior wall, and also results in a house that easily lends itself to the integration of active solar systems because it requires so little energy to heat and cool it. I believe that current code requirements of a single 2 x 6 wall with R-21 batt insulation is inadequate if only for the reason that almost no one doing production type housing takes the lengthy amount of time required to properly insulate a wall with electrical wires and plumbing lines present. Insulating with foam is on the right track but I would not want to be the mechanic who needs to trace a leak or a faulty wire in a wall that has been foamed. I like your idea about adding an additional 1 inch of air space to the 1 inch of foam board but I am concerned that the wall is approaching a thickness that starts to compromise valuable living space. A larger question looming in my mind, is that are we quickly approaching a point in energy costs where a additional 10 K spent to super insulate a house, will almost become a necessity.
In any event, the discussion is extremely helpful, thanks again.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
mx2
millennium club


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 1968
Location: Miami, Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by mx2

typically the way plumbers and electricians repair faulty lines is to isolate the fault and cut it at two points and bypass it with new line. The point being, to repair the lines, whether it's in air space or buried in material (often embedded in concrete for example), it's easier and faster to do the bypass rather then actually fixing the one faulty point. They essentially end up re-building and re-finishing the walls anyway...

That said, the code minimums are just that....minimum requirements. If left to their own devices, builders would opt out of any extra costs and not put any insulation if they didn't have to put it in. But there is law against improvements and higher effeciencies. You make a valid point about valuable real estate...you would indeed be encroaching into occupiable space and that's a trade-off that has to be factored in. That's why it's typically a single cavity wall system with an exterior insulated & moisture resistant wall and an interior insulated wall. The foil backed insulation is best towards the interior because it "reflects" the heat/coolness back into the space that needs it...and like I mentioned, if you want greater effeciency, look into improving the air space. The greatest hindrance to this is the lack of proper venting. Hot air will radiate heat, but if it were vented enough to get fresh air then it's a very effecient insulating "layer". It's not common to detail this, but there are many ways to increase venting...another interesting idea I've read about was using the grey water from your plumbing system to run through the walls and either heat or cool the walls...but again, there are many alternative concepts and methods and it requires further investigation. All and all, when pushing the envelope, so to speak, it's good to experiment and take a chance, but you do so with a lot of research to back it up...in this specific issue, I would tend to agree the 3rd layer of insulation "sandwiched" between the walls without any air space is not worth it. I wuld look to using higher insulating materials for your walls, including the finish (ie, better than gyp. borad & paint??).

mx2.5

_________________
*Art of Architecture: The conscious use of skill and creative imagination in the production of an aesthetic building.
*Science of Architecture: The calculated use of technical skill and knowledge in the construction of a functional building.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
csintexas
millennium club


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 1960
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by csintexas

It's pointless to have an air space in the middle of a wall. What is it supposed to be doing? The whole purpose of a double wall is to create a larger space for insulation and to prevent thermal bridging through the studs.

Airspaces are typically only used with masonry. You need to be more concerned on how the walls breath. In other words is any moisture able to get into the wall system and if it does how will it be removed?

What climate is this being designed for?

_________________
Chris Stewart
Modern Texas Home Project
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
arch*tect



Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 4
Location: United States

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 11:53 am    Post subject: Air space in cavity wall is useful Reply with quoteFind all posts by arch*tect

Air space between walls are the cheapest form of insulated wall construction.

If one wants more efficient insulation for walls, then one should go for beyond airspace wall construction, for instance foils, foam board...etc. But one should never deny air, because it is one of the best insulation material you find and it is useful.

Arrow It is highly recommended that airspace wall construction requires proper ventilation to avoids moist contents and to prevent damp on interior wall.

arch*tect
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
birgco



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 3:38 pm    Post subject: double wall construction technique Reply with quoteFind all posts by birgco

Several good points are made. I believe the most critical (and the one I am struggling with the most) is what happens to moisture entering a double wall with a 1 inch foam board in-between. It should not condense because the foam board will be pretty warm with R-21 on the outside of it and virtually no penetrations or obstructions in the 2x6 exterior wall to adversely effect the full R factor. Btw, the house will have an air to air heat exchanger to keep fresh air circulatiing thru-out the house. In my previously constructed double wall, there was a 1" air space. Now if that space was totally void of air movement, it would probably be a good insulator and thermal bridge. I doubt this is the case, so this is why I am looking hard at the 1 inch foam board instead. If the foam board is properly sealed (tyvek or similar tape at the seams) this should result in a virtually leak free wall. The problem of sealing electrical boxes and pipes is eliminated. The wall should have an R value in the neighborhood of 40. Trying to build a double-wall with the vapor barrier behind the sheetrock is not easy because of the before-mentioned electrical boxes, etc. I have seen houses built with a 2 inch foam board on the exterior wall but this concerns me more with condensation potential and also difficulty in attaching exterior finish, etc. Interested in comments about the placement of the 1" foam in the middle of the wall and thoughts about moisture, condensation, etc. thanks, birgco
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
birgco



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 3:45 pm    Post subject: double wall construction techniques Reply with quoteFind all posts by birgco

Btw, house to be built in metro-new york area. 0-45 degree winters on average. birgco
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
csintexas
millennium club


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 1960
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by csintexas

Air is not a good insulator (unless it is in small cells), it is only good with radiant barriers. If air is such a good insulator why bother with insulation?

I would not be so sure condensation will not occur inside the wall. How is the airspace insulated at the top and bottom?

The rigid foam board is a good way to prevent thermal bridging between the framing. The airspace in between the two walls is bad design. No radiant barrier is needed or desired there. Foam boards are permeable to different degrees but I think the ones with foil are not. The perms may be listed on the sheet or you could find out that info from the manufacturer.

I don't design for cold climates but I believe the vapor barrier is normally placed under the sheetrock.

So I think the 1" permeable foam between the walls with no air space is the way to go.

_________________
Chris Stewart
Modern Texas Home Project
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
mx2
millennium club


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 1968
Location: Miami, Florida

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by mx2

I understand your fear of air chris, however, you underestimate the value of a well detailed cavity wall, since air is a great energy resistant "material" and it's free... Cool

The problem lies in moisture control and the design and installation has to be perfectly executed or else...trouble. But compared to triple layers of insulation, that technically conduct heat from one material to the next, I would be surprised if the total R-values matched. I'll have to try and calculate it some other time... I found this online which I'll paste the most imporant passage below. Hope this helps...

mx2.5

Quote:


http://www.wbdg.org/design/env_wall.php

Cavity Wall

A cavity wall (also referred to as "screen" or "drained" wall systems) is considered by many to be the preferred method of construction in most climatic and rainfall zones in the United States. This is due primarily to the pressure-equalization that can be achieved, and the redundancy offered by this type of wall assembly to resist uncontrolled, bulk rainwater penetration. A term commonly used to describe clay brick and/or concrete masonry wall systems installed over a largely open, unobstructed air space/drainage cavity, this term is now used more generically to define any wall system or assembly that relies upon a partially or fully concealed air space and drainage plane to resist bulk rainwater penetration and, depending upon the design, to improve the overall thermal performance at the building enclosure. Drained cavity walls typically include the following general characteristics:

An exterior cladding element that is intended to either shed or absorb the majority of bulk rainwater penetration before it enters the concealed spaces of the wall assembly (the initial, though not primary, line of defense against rainwater penetration in this type of wall assembly).
A drainage cavity, or air space, that is intended to collect and control rainwater that passes through the exterior cladding element and re-direct that water to the building exterior. The cavity may be ventilated for pressure equalization, either mechanically or passively, to facilitate this process by preventing negative pressure that may draw rainwater across the cavity into the "dry" sections of the wall assembly via anchors, wall ties, and similar penetrations).
An internal drainage plane that is intended to function as the primary line of defense against uncontrolled rainwater penetration. This layer serves functionally as the dividing line between the "wet" and "dry" sections, or "zones," of the exterior wall assembly. This layer can be created using a variety of both dry sheet-good or wet, trowel-applied products depending upon the climate in which the building is to be located and the desired level of vapor permeability necessary to prevent condensation and potential mold growth on the dry side of the exterior wall assembly.
An insulating layer, which can be located either inboard or outboard of the internal drainage plane depending upon the geographic region and climate in which the building or structure is to be located.
Although a drained cavity wall offers many advantages over the other three (3) types of exterior wall systems discussed in this section, it should be noted that an improperly designed and/or executed cavity wall system can be very disruptive and costly to properly and effectively repair after construction is complete. Corrosion of mild steel wall ties, structural connections and related wall elements, together with interior mold growth, often remain concealed from view in this type of wall system, and can continue for a period of years before manifesting themselves in a location that can be readily observed and remediated. Furthermore, because the primary drainage plane and many of the most critical interface details are often concealed inside the wet zone in this type of wall system, direct intervention and repair of these elements can be highly invasive and disruptive to an occupied building, and will often negatively impact the overall appearance of the building. To mitigate these concerns, a comprehensive building envelope quality assurance program similar to the program discussed later in this section is often considered extremely desirable with this type of wall system in order to ensure that critical cavity wall elements are properly designed and effectively installed at the time of original construction.

In pressure-equalized, "rainscreen" cavity wall systems, the primary drainage plane, and principal air barrier are located in the same plane between the wet and dry zones of the wall assembly. In colder climates, the insulation is also placed outboard of the innermost (primary) drainage plane in this type of wall assembly, inside the wet zone (drainage cavity) of the wall. This approach, which dates back to the 1960's in North America, can be extremely effective in resisting uncontrolled, bulk rainwater penetration. However, the principal advantage of this system, which is to prevent a negative air pressure differential from occurring across the exterior wall assembly (a condition that can "draw" rainwater through the enclosure and into the building), can also be extremely difficult to effectively achieve in the field. This is due primarily to the relatively complex detailing often required at exterior wall penetrations through the concealed air barrier and primary drainage plane, and the correspondingly high level of workmanship required to effectively seal those conditions to prevent the flow of unconditioned air inward across the exterior wall assembly.

_________________
*Art of Architecture: The conscious use of skill and creative imagination in the production of an aesthetic building.
*Science of Architecture: The calculated use of technical skill and knowledge in the construction of a functional building.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
csintexas
millennium club


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 1960
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2007 5:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by csintexas

If this was a masonry wall system than a cavity or drainage plane inside the wall would be good.
_________________
Chris Stewart
Modern Texas Home Project
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Architecture Forum Page 1 of 6
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

 




Latest Posts   ·   ArchWeek Jobs Board   ·   Classifieds   ·   User Galleries   ·   Scrapbook   ·   Open 3D Gallery
 Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:  
Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Places     Models     GB Image Index     ArchWeek Library
Professional Directory   Web Directory   Competitions   Conferences   Events & Exhibits     Products     Media Kit
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Free 3D   ·   Search
© 2004-2008 Artifice, Inc. · Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thème myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate