America controlled by the Brits

[Richard Haut]

as the realities of the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq (and soon Iran) are shown to be based on total lies, it is worth noting that what is happening is a re-run of British imperial actions in 1917 and 1920 onwards.

British imperial power depended on its navy, and by then the navy needed oil. America was not seen as a country to depend on because US companies have a habit of squeezing those that they supply when the commodity is seriously needed.

Much of the attempts to control Iraqi and Iranian oil were attempts to free Britain from US dependence for oil, to keep America out of the market, and to contain Russia (before and after the Revolution).

Like the rest of the British empire, it all fell to pieces.

Now Britain has found a country to do its fighting for it - or has it ? Nasty though British imperialism was, it did at least have a sense of trying to deal with locals (the friendly ones anyway).

A thug like Bush has no such understanding. He has managed to unite all Muslims and many others because he is purely violent. The attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq are disasters. In neither country do the puppet-regimes have real control outside of minimal areas or the US encampments. A recent report by a highly respected journalist found that all police posts on one of the main highways out of Baghdad were abandoned. When the troublesome cleric stood up to the Americans, the Americans withdrew and (wait for it ......) asked the cleric which streets they, the Americans, were allowed to patrol. The cleric named three streets - the Americans meekly obeyed. Now even the Turkish lorry drivers are pulling out.

Attacks number many per day. The hired thugs (mainly ex British and US special services) just get killed. How many was it ? 80 in eight days ? Not reported because they are "private contractors".

America tried to get the British to help them out of some of the worst areas. The British refused. British casualties have been very small in the Iraq war - very small.

Britain is too small to be really powerful and too poor to have an impressive military force these days. However the advantage is that they do understand the realities of imperialism, with many of those in positions of influence deeply resenting the loss of the British empire.

If you can't or don't want to do the fighting yourself, best to find some gullible fool to do it for you.

Perfidious Albion may yet pay America back for the outrageous rip-off called "lease-lend" and the thirty year terror campaign that the US financed in Britain.

When America pulls out of Iraq, don't be surprised if there is a healthy little Iraqi-UK oil concession in the valuable southern oilfields .........

[Richard Haut]

the devastation brought to Iraq is an obscenity only echoed in the way that the Nazis behaved in Poland.

assassination squads hunting down academics and intellectuals.

great libraries deliberately destroyed.

heavily armed troops carefully sniping women and children.

a massive reduction in access to potable water.

theft and destruction at some of the world's great archaeological sites and museums.

arresting people on the streets for no reason and molesting and abusing them.

routine torture as stated policy.

wholesale attempts at theft of natural resources.

land sprayed with depleted uranium armaments.

stand up and salute your flag Donald - in the name of Lyndie England.

[Richard Haut]

" just where did so many of Hitler's henchmen flee at the end of World War II? "

a significant number (such as the scientists who performed horror experiements in Dachau and other camps) were sneaked to America by the US Government under "Operation Paperclip".

for all your snivelling, the parallel with Poland is accurate - and for the same reason. The intention of America is to turn Iraq and other nations into puppet (or as the NWO would prefer it: slave) states. It is a system that does not actually work.

[Richard Haut]

war on "terrorism", Donald ?

the Brits do not like the fact that a product made by Bush and Rumsfeld's old buddies Eli Lilly has been found in their drinking water.

not very subtle, is it ? - forum abuse - in the drinking water.

[Richard Haut]

now that is a subject that we are likely to agree on. (Reminds me of the old Victor Borge joke about the man who invented a cure for which there was no disease. Sadly his wife catches the cure and dies).

there is a new British government initiative to "force" parents into having their children having some new kind of multi-innoculation. (Why "force" one wonders).

as for the - forum abuse - ....... what made me doubly curious is that a while ago the British government made great efforts to stop people drinking bottled water. Now why would they do that ?

I don't know much about the big pharmaceuticals, but I keep hearing some deeply critical comments and then somebody said "you aren't seriously going to put that in your coffee, are you ?" "It's only sweetner," I said. "Look it up on the internet, look who pushed it through FDA approval when it apparently failed so many tests, and then see if you want to eat it again. If that is not a poison, I don't know what is."

I did look it up. It was pushed through the FDA by Donald Rumsfeld. It has horrific contra-indications, including (the only funny part) causing obesity (carbohydrate craving) .... and it is called "Aspartame".

the correct response was shown by the Royal Navy. While the fuss was going on about the troops going to Iraq being given strange cocktails of vaccines, it was reported that crates of the vaccines were washing up on the southern shores of England.

The Captains of the Royal Navy just chucked the stuff in the sea.

[Richard Haut]

when I left Britain, I felt as if I was "de-toxing".

I was.

the chemicals in the food there are startling. The supply is mostly in the hands of a very few supermarkets. Here everything is labelled so it is possible to avoid many additives - and I hold to my view that buying from the poorest peasants from the hills is best because they cannot afford the chemicals in the first place.

the only credible reason that I have heard for this poisoning of the food chain is mass mind-control.

However it isn't really mind control. It is confusion. People suffer panic attacks and, yes, attention deficiency because of the garbage in the food.

Incidentally, the organisation that said that there was - forum abuse - in the water was not, as one might expect, an extremist green-group. It was the United Kingdom's Environment Agency - and now the story is being played down.

[Richard Haut]

I see what you mean - what is interesting (aside of FDA approval) is the incessant saying that it is not a stimulant. One of the common side-effects of Strattera is stated as being Influenza. That should have doctors in a panic.

The snake-oil salesmen have gone scientific. Selling fake charms and potions goes back to medieval times, but selling deliberately dangerous charms and potions is something else.

What I found curious about Aspartame was why, having invented a sweetener, couldn't Searle (who made it) or Monsanto (who bought it) have extended the development to make it a safe product.

Is it just lazy, greedy corporates - or is it deliberate poisoning ?

The point about brand credibility is that the real response is not to want any products made by those companies.

Monsanto are close to that status in Europe already. However this is not just a US problem - the place to watch is called Porton Down in Britain, the oldest bio-weapons development authority in the world with a very nasty history of testing bio-weapons, poison gas, etc on people under covers such as "testing for a cure for the common cold". Several tens of thousands of court claims are outstanding against Porton Down.

Snake-oil salesmen or bio-terrorists.