To Rod Terry - SimpleSpan & BackSpan

Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » PowerCADD Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dwm



Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 5:46 am    Post subject: To Rod Terry - SimpleSpan & BackSpan Reply with quoteFind all posts by dwm

Hi Rod;

Arez Anzel (Compuneering) emailed me copies of SimpleSpan & BackSpan to test drive. They work in OS9 and Classic in OSX.

I had to unpack them from the Font/DA suitcases in OS9. I would ask Arez to do that before shipping if you don't have the ability to run OS9 stand alone. I also changed the main dialog windows to floating with a close box using ResEdit. If it the only app you will be running in Classic this may not be necessary.

I passed this info to Arez. I'm paying $145 US. It's expensive but worth it to me. I've used SimpleSpan a lot in just 2 days.

SimpleSpan does point, uniform and variable load calculations. And multiple loads. It supports all standard beam types including dimensional lumber, rough sawn, steel and glue lam (veneer). You can also define or edit member attributes and stress factors. The resulting data can be exported as a text file to use in other apps.

If you get the software and need some help just ask.
(I'll be away for a week)

Good Luck,

D. Mousley
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Andy Caldwell



Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 85
Location: Sterling, VA

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Andy Caldwell

Has Anzel updated SimpleSpan to reflect the latest lumber values?
That's one of the reasons we stopped using it several years ago.
It is useless without accurate data.

Andy

_________________
Andy Caldwell, AIA
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Rod Terry



Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 58
Location: Corvallis, Oregon

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Rod Terry

Thanks for the tip. I also had Arez Anzel send me copies.

When I rebooted to open in OS9, my screen just blinked a disk with a question mare flashing. It took me about an hour and a half to figure out how to again boot into OSX. At that point, I gave up on Simple Span and Back Span.

How many years was it that Suitcase and Desk Accessory mover was a routine part of a Mac OS. And how soon I forgot what they were all about.

So, if I have Arez send me just the programs, unpacked, all I have to do is place them in my applications folder and they will work in Classic mode?

The $175.00 cost seems reasonable.

Thanks again, I'll give it a try.

Rod
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
dwm



Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 11:25 am    Post subject: Rod & Andy Reply with quoteFind all posts by dwm

Rod;
I turned Classic on first, and just double click to open. Either way it should work.


Andy;
I compared results with our local building code tables and so far have found them to be as good and better. Not being an engineer, I'm required to design to meet or exceed code, which makes the software useful for me. Mostly my needs are for spans that are not listed or not easily interpreted from the tables.

I have asked Arez about updating the data source.

D. Mousley
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Matt



Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 447
Location: Sterling, Virginia

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Matt

SimpleSpan and BackSpan (to the best of my knowledge) don't use the current strength values for lumber grading as required by the NDS. They tested a lot of lumber, and found, for example that strength values for, say, a 2x12 HemFir #2 are significantly different then those for a 2x8 HemFir #2. Consequently, you must use different strength values for each SIZE as well as SPECIES of lumber.

SimpleSpan is not set up to do this automatically. You can manually enter custom strength values, but it is tedious to compare the performance and capabilities of different sizes and species this way.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
lavardera



Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 422
Location: merchantville, nj

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by lavardera

I remember some architect somewhere working on a new beam calc program in real basic... now who was that? Matt, do you remember?
_________________
--
greg
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Rob C



Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 535
Location: Southern Connecticut

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2004 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Rob C

Matt wrote:
SimpleSpan and BackSpan (to the best of my knowledge) don't use the current strength values for lumber grading as required by the NDS. They tested a lot of lumber, and found, for example that strength values for, say, a 2x12 HemFir #2 are significantly different then those for a 2x8 HemFir #2. Consequently, you must use different strength values for each SIZE as well as SPECIES of lumber.

SimpleSpan is not set up to do this automatically. You can manually enter custom strength values, but it is tedious to compare the performance and capabilities of different sizes and species this way.


I remember having to add a Look Up Table for that size factor to my own Excel worksheets for simple spans. I started with BeamMac and then upgraded to FrameMac for continuous beam and more complex stuff. As I recall, the only material property Beam/FrameMac needed was E, which you have to type in. The other info is all properties of section, which are independent of the material. It's up to the user do figure out whether the stresses calculated are allowable or not.

It's been a while, but I remember using Excel to make my own table of section properties for FrameMac (the one included didn't have LVL and PSL sections). I also used Excel to make a table of allowable stresses for the wood I used to make it easy to decifer the results FrameMac gives out. It's not hard to do; once you set up the formulas once, they repeat down for every size of lumber, with the size factor as one of the parameters.

Rob
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
patrickm



Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 346
Location: santa barbara, ca

PostPosted: Sat May 29, 2004 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by patrickm

[quote="Rob C"]
Matt wrote:
I also used Excel to make a table of allowable stresses for the wood I used to make it easy to decifer the results FrameMac gives out. It's not hard to do; once you set up the formulas once, they repeat down for every size of lumber, with the size factor as one of the parameters.

Rob


I do the same thing, but have the spreadsheet determine allowable moments and shear for each size and load duration factor.
patrick
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Matt



Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 447
Location: Sterling, Virginia

PostPosted: Sat May 29, 2004 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Matt

Allowable strength values for a given species of lumber vary according to the size of the section, according to the NDS.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Rob C



Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 535
Location: Southern Connecticut

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Rob C

Matt wrote:
Allowable strength values for a given species of lumber vary according to the size of the section, according to the NDS.


Right. It sure made life more complicated when they did that.

What I'm saying is that I used Excel to create my own table of numbers of allowable stresses for each size of lumber for a given species, and printed it out as a reference. The size factor that changes the allowable values for the lumber because of the size of the section is one of the parameters of the equation. It cost me time to create the worksheet to begin with, but has payed back by referencing it again and again.

Rob
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
patrickm



Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 346
Location: santa barbara, ca

PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by patrickm

Rob C wrote:
Matt wrote:
Allowable strength values for a given species of lumber vary according to the size of the section, according to the NDS.


Right. It sure made life more complicated when they did that.

What I'm saying is that I used Excel to create my own table of numbers of allowable stresses for each size of lumber for a given species, and printed it out as a reference. The size factor that changes the allowable values for the lumber because of the size of the section is one of the parameters of the equation. It cost me time to create the worksheet to begin with, but has payed back by referencing it again and again.

Rob


That's exactly what I have done too... Once you have the tables, it's a real timesaver.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
dwm



Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 6:49 pm    Post subject: SimplSpan & BackSpan Reply with quoteFind all posts by dwm

Just got back from vacation.

The following was sent to me by Arez Anzel of COMPUneering Inc. regarding SimpleSpan & BackSpan . . .

"We feel it only right to drop the price of the SimpleSpan/BackSpan
bundle. The new price will be US$95/CDN$125, effective immediately.
We'll also eat the cost of mailing the manual. (In Canada please add 7%
GST, and in Ontario we must collect 8% PST as well.)

If you are interested in trying the programs, please contact us. We can
email them to you using the honor system: no paperwork, no payment, no
obligation. If you like the bundle, buy it; if you don't, just delete
it.

The lumber values are outdated, but one user reported that the
difference was only a couple of percent and that "SimpleSpan appears to
do what I need." We don't have any plans presently for updating the
tables or the programs.

Erez Anzel
COMPUneering Inc., 113 McCabe Crescent, Thornhill ON L4J 2S6 CANADA
Tel.: 905-738-4601; fax: 905-738-5207; erez@compuneering.com;
www.compuneering.com"

. . . Please also note that they will be shipped as apps, not the desk accessory suitcases, as they were before, and with the main window in each app changed to a floating window.

SimpleSpan & BackSpan will run in OS9 and in Classic under OSX.

Regards,

D. Mousley
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Andy Caldwell



Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 85
Location: Sterling, VA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Andy Caldwell

D Mousley:

I can't help but reply.

Arez Anzel of COMPUneering Inc is doing no one a favor by droping the price on an outdated structural application used to size beams and joists.
Anyone who uses SimpleSpan is being foolish in thinking they are saving money just because "SimpleSpan appears to do what I need."

Andy

[/quote]

_________________
Andy Caldwell, AIA
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageAIM Address    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
fred johnson



Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 57
Location: CT

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by fred johnson

Basic structural design is built into vectorwork 11. Is this the sort of thing that would be useful..maybe ES would consider developing something similar:

The Simple Beam Calculator puts up a dialog with a picture of the beam condition on the left. 13 beam conditions are supported:
-Simple Supports, Concentrated Load
-Simple Supports, Two Concentrated Loads
-Simple Supports, Uniform Load
-Simple Supports, variable load (3 scenarios)
-One End Fixed, Concentrated Load
-One End Fixed, Uniform Load
-One End Fixed, Variable Load
-Both Ends Fixed, Concentrated Load
-Both Ends Fixed, Uniform Load
-One End Fixed, One simple, Concentrated Load
-One End Fixed, One simple, Uniform Load

So, you choose your condition, choose unit (Metric or Imperial), and enter the values corresponding with the variables labeled in the diagram, as well as span, E, I, and S values. The calculator solves for:
-Left and right reactions;
-Left and right end moments (if any);
-max Shear;
-max Moment;
-max Stress;
-max deflection;
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
dwm



Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by dwm

Andy Caldwell wrote:


Anyone who uses SimpleSpan is being foolish in thinking they are saving money just because "SimpleSpan appears to do what I need."



Your comment is understood and appreciated. I know it's not upto engineering standards but it serve my needs. It's not just a matter of cost.

Thanks,

D. Mousley
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » PowerCADD Discussion Page 1 of 2
Goto page 1, 2  Next

 




Latest Posts   ·   ArchWeek Jobs Board   ·   Classifieds   ·   User Galleries   ·   Scrapbook   ·   Open 3D Gallery
 Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:  
Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Places     Models     GB Image Index     ArchWeek Library
Professional Directory   Web Directory   Competitions   Conferences   Events & Exhibits     Products     Media Kit
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Free 3D   ·   Search
© 2004-2008 Artifice, Inc. · Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thème myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate