|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Donald
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:14 pm Post subject: More prisoner abuse? |
    |
|
The ACLU is at it again, this time ganging up on U.S. Special Forces troops in Iraq... http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/110250903342720.xml It's not exactly known why the American Civil Liberties Union is now concerning itself with the civil liberties of terrorists. Who knows.
The ACLU has their panties in a knot over some special forces guys that threatened some DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) personnel and told them not to report "prisoner abuse." So what sort of abuse are we talking about?
These are the same old complaints: sleep deprivation, humiliation and forced nudity. Abuse? I think not. It's called interrogating prisoners to get information; information that will save the lives of men and women fighting on the front lines of the war on terror.
If we have to make people uncomfortable in order to get them to tell us what we want to know, then so be it. Lives might actually be saved. By the way, will the ACLU be investigating Al-Qaeda for the heads of prisoners they sawed off with a hunting knife? Will they be as concerned about Nick Berg  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin Site Admin

Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 1407 Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:46 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
Donald, I find both your attitude and your terms of discourse disgusting.
Torture, whether physical or psychological, is not something to be made light of, or to be condoned.
The United States of America I am a proud citizen of protects and honors whistleblowers against the abuses which tend to naturally arise in overwhelmingly powerful institutions of any kind - including the U.S. military.
The American Civil Liberties Union has a proud record of protecting such honorable whistleblowers, by upholding the principles of the U.S. Constitution and our Bill of Rights.
I don't think you actually understand the concepts of freedom, democracy, community, and justice, and what it really takes for them to survive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Donald
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 2:16 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
Heres my concept of Freedom:
When you're driving home from work today and you feel the temptation to blow your horn at that old man in front of you who just isn't quite quick enough at making that turn, stop for a second. That old man may have scaled the cliffs of Normandy, or he may have waded ashore on Iwo Jima.
We don't owe our freedoms to the ACLU or to the politicians who infest the halls of congress. We owe our freedoms to the men and woman who have been ready and willing to stand before a tyrant who threatens us and say "Not this time. Not while I'm here."  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phansford
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Posts: 851 Location: SW Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 2:46 pm Post subject: Re: More prisoner abuse? |
    |
|
| Donald wrote: | | These are the same old complaints: sleep deprivation, humiliation and forced nudity. |
It has been proven time and time again that these methods do not work. This according to my military friends in the know. We learned this lesson during WWII and after. So why try now.
I have to whole heartedly agree with Kevin.
Concerning our freedoms only being connected to people in the Military, I think men and women like Abraham Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, Martin Luther King, Bobby Kennedy, LBJ, Rosa Parks, Medgar Evers, or any of the everyday people fighting for a decent job who were killed at the Haymarket Square Riots or by Henry Ford's thugs at River Rouge, just to name a few would like to differ with you.
John Kerry did just as much for his country protesting the Viet Nam War as he did fighting in the jungle.
| Donald wrote: | | We don't owe our freedoms to the ACLU or to the politicians who infest the halls of congress. We owe our freedoms to the men and woman who have been ready and willing to stand before a tyrant |
So Donald with your definition, what did you think of the young soldier drilling Rumsfeld about not having the proper vehicle armor to complete the task at hand. Should we court martial him for using his First Amendment right to free speech? He's seen more combat than Bush, Cheney, and Rush Limbaugh put together....just this week.And according to you this young soldier is five times the American than Bush and Cheney put together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Donald
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:12 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
The International Red Cross, phansy and his friends in the know are whining about tactics used by the U.S. government at the Islamic Terrorist Detention Centers. So what are they complaining about?
Lets see, the Military is using psychological and physical coercion that is "tantamount to torture." I guess that means we're not allowed to make Islamic terrorists a little uncomfortable. The complaints include: loud and persistent noise and music, prolonged cold, and "some beatings." Beatings? Just what constitutes a "beating" to the IRC appeasers?
The brutal truth is that if I, or, I suspect, if you had in your presence an Islamic terrorist that you knew had information on when and where the next terrorist attack on the United States would be, there is little you wouldn't do to get that information out of him. Maybe we need a sign at Guantanamo: "The beatings will stop when morale improves."
We are at war with the most vicious enemy this country has ever known. Islamic terrorists have vowed to ensure our personal destruction so that they may enslave the world with their hateful ideology.
If we want to win World War IV, we're going to have to do whatever it takes. Making some enemy combatants a little uncomfortable with hip hop music and an occasional spanking certainly qualifies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SDR millennium club
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 1884 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:20 pm Post subject: well |
    |
|
There you have it, folks: the dangerous fundamentalism, the "received wisdom" of the True Patriot. Combine this with the equally simplistic True Believer of the Religious Right and you have what we're really up against in America: rot from within. Who needs foreign enemies when we have the Trojan Horse of "Might Makes Right" and "God On Our Side." Anyone who can't see or admit (as our fearless President has finally begun to do) that we've made a mountain out of a molehill, and more numerous and angrier enemies, in Iraq, is someone to be really afraid of. As this regressive element gains power, feeding on and feeding the fear already sown, reason is increasingly crushed under its self-serving and megalomaniac tread. Watch as Sen Ron Coleman (R-Minn) bleats for the removal of Kofi Annan (read last month's Harper's for the truth), a patient diplomat he could only hope to emulate; the echoes of Sen McCarthy are painfully clear to those who remember. . .
SDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Donald
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:31 am Post subject: |
    |
|
A pause from the thread origins:
| Quote: | | Watch as Sen Ron Coleman (R-Minn) bleats for the removal of Kofi Annan |
...and you can bet Kofi's not quitting either, despite being implicated in one of the biggest financial frauds in the history of the world, he's already said he is not going to resign...and apparently being responsible for billions of dollars in bribes and mismanagement is not enough for Kofi to get fired. Doesn't look like there are too many countries clamoring for his resignation, either.
Kofi is now distancing himself from his own son, saying "He knows that I have always been very sensitive about conflict of interests and it is not something that I would appreciate." I can't imagine a bigger conflict of interest than his son working for a company that was on Saddam's payroll. How about Kojo using Kofi's official UN residence to hold parties? There hasn't been a more obvious sale of influence since Bill Clinton rented out the Lincoln Bedroom.
No wonder most of the UN was opposed to the invasion of Iraq. Saddam was lining their pockets. Apparently they know a sugar daddy when they see one. Maybe you can't blame Kofi. After all, if he resigns, where is he going to go? What do you want to bet he wouldn't move back to Ghana  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|