|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Muyasser
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 6
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NLArch
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
| Hey, that visually looked very impressive however I think it may be viable to illustrate the actual "flow" of yachts in and out of your club. Visually its astounding. For example what is the tan structure that looks like a bicycle rack used for? Design looks awesome! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muyasser
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:36 am Post subject: |
    |
|
Thak you for your replay ...
actually i studied before the boats barking and marina design
but not in much details ,, because it's not my specilaist
but if they have to do any design they have to solve each problems
and i think there are many in my design
but all have solution
thank you again  _________________ I'm New Here (^_^) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
London_Arch_10
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
I feel the design is poor for the following reasons:
- The design does not appear to have considered human occupation or inhabitation at any point in its conception. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest how the spaces may be used by people. There is no consideration for the arrival or visitors, to passive circulation, to reflection, to gathering, to public, or to private spaces. To the moment of interchange between land and water, to the time between arriving on a yacht and entering the locality. You need to remember that architecture is for people, whether it be a chair, a building or a public space. People have a scale, and moments when their bodies will come into contact with the architecture.
- The proposal is shown from an angle which it will never be viewed. unless of course you are designing it for someone who will fly their private helicopter into and around the site with very kitsch music playing in the background, or on an Ipod!!!
- The site itself is based on a form, a circle, again which has no relation to what you are designing or for whom. There is a chronic lack of competence in the understanding of tectonic overlays and site formation.
- The proposal would suggest more of a cheap render attempt for a 20 second TV advert than a serious proposal for architecture school. The music does not help this.
- There is no integrity to your architecture gestures.
I believe you are too far away from this project (metaphorically and literally). You need to begin to understand and consider more what you are doing.
I would strongly suggest you begin to look more into architectural theory in order to understand the subject better. You should maybe consider the writings of Peter Zumthor which will help you to understand the relationship between architecture experienced by people and the concept of an 'atmosphere'.
I also think you will benefit from placing your computer to one side, and sketching your ideas onto paper and working into them. This will help you to understand better the process of design. You can then work your visualisation images onto the computer when you begin to understand what you are doing.
I hope the above does not sound over critical. We do of course work in a critical industry and I hope the advice can in some way help you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
archiwei
Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 7:22 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
very nice try.
Very good sense of presentation. _________________ ******************************
Architectural Rendering
http://www.archiz.com
******************************
Tips & Tutorials for 3D rendering
http://archiz-tips.blogspot.com
****************************** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muyasser
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:12 am Post subject: |
    |
|
Thank you every body
I will take your comments in the new projects _________________ I'm New Here (^_^) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
starkca3
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:34 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
london arch's critique seems to hit it on the head. I agree.
I definitely like the "base" idea but it seems like it needs to be worked out a little more perhaps.
Like 10 said, the flow of actual ships
the flow of people also is very important i think
and a sense of proportions, put in some people so we can know if we're looking at toy boats or real boats  _________________ busy~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|