|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Kevin Matthews
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 473 Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin Site Admin

Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 1048 Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:18 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
| Would you agree that "Architecture's communicative function was disregarded throughout the first half of the twentieth century"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
celento
Joined: 07 Jul 2004 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:35 am Post subject: |
    |
|
No.
Communication through built form is impossible to avoid. However, the message that was sent in the early to mid 20th century was one quite different than the one being sent previously.
Was communication less friendly, more idiomatic, and incomprehensible to a large number of people? Quite possibly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mx2
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 1827 Location: Miami, Florida
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:47 am Post subject: |
    |
|
One year later...an interesting question indeed.
I agree celento. I imagine that part of the two-way street of communication also entails that people (general public) were engaged in simpler and more familiar things, particularly in the local sense. Now with the age of information that has saturated every nook of the earth with "global" ideas, it's as if we have resurrected and expanded the tower of babel...we simply have so many ideas and so many voices and very few audiences that actually listen...except at our local levels. Ironic that we seem to be coming full circle. What of this Global Village...? Is it just theory?
mx2 _________________ *Art of Architecture: The conscious use of skill and creative imagination in the production of an aesthetic building.
*Science of Architecture: The calculated use of technical skill and knowledge in the construction of a functional building. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|