silver screen gallery: critique

This forum is for DesignCommunity forum suggestions and discussion of community administration issues. Post questions about forum posting guidelines here.

Postby The Architect » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:30 am

Landy, I couldn't disagree more with your DC forum interpretation. Not only should we encourage a wide range of creative interests but we should also find ways for those creative interests to have a benefit for the 'greater good'. And the 'greater good' is always the development of the Individual!
As long as those who post in this forum hold Architecture as an interest (as p.c. surely does) to these forums - then other expressions of their creativity should also be accepted, discussed and encouraged. Because in truth, you can't spearate one from the other(s). Just as one's architecture is important (good or bad), then so too are one's other creative expressions.

Many architects have several creative outlets and, have been able to make sense of them all, lol. And live to tell about them, lol. I am one such person.

As for P.C.'s Silver Screen idea, my comments are to found in the thread - along with some of my own drawings. Btw, I have thousands of drawings and dozens of sketch books full of 'ideas'.

Don't you?

Or, perhaps you hold some sort of grudge against those that can do more than just write about creativity and the creative process. As guys like usarender well knows - words (and all those google links) come cheap and easy - one who really doesn't discuss anything beyond his 'control'.

But if you show us some work unique to your character - then to a forum such as DC, thats worth a whole lot more!

Landy, take a look at what p.c. shows on his S.S. See the grey tones? Understand his interpretation of structure? Landy, look beyond the surface. That is what you get to see/enjoy/read from those who post images/thoughts from across several of their creative expressions.

Now compare that to google scapers like usarender.



Take care...
The Architect
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:49 am

Postby P.C. » Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:54 am

Thank you.
My attitude to painting must be understood by the fact, that a little more than halve a year ago I didn't think I could paint. A lot will maybe say that that is the fact about many fine arts painters ,but when I started as you know, it was with light and projectors , most of the early pictures in Silver Screen Galleri was only possible becaurse of the old opuaque projectores now replaced with overhead or digital projectores --- but they can something that other types of hardware can not and their Opitcs ....... well I just seen one od the optics simular to the one I uses the most, sold for near 300 Eur for just the front optic, beside I bacame a collector of old german optics , recently we couldn't resist the line of theater binoculars of Zeiss ,rare beauties and fine things to invest in but , this only to explain how 3dh brought me on to painting, then optics and various rare projectors, then painting again as even I suggest anyone to try live the satisfaction of when a piece realy work, then there is much more in it, than just painting after a picture. In fact I must warn that there are methods I develobed --- that's a smaller word for invented --- methods I sinply havn't seen or heard of anyone else using, and without these methods, "painting after" some picture simply will turn out bad. A projector is simply not enough there realy has to be put more into it plus some master-secrets.
About 3dh I just told SDR , that if I had the time and money -- then recursive programming would proberly make a huge difference, I know recursive programming even it is years I dealed with it, and true , this is more what I say I can emagine, even I am sure that methods that generate building structure, would profit greatly by just a bit recursive programming, but "selling" your works as designer or artist , making it possible to invest in hardware and out of house services see, there usarender realy did his harm, and I guess from the start usarenders goal has been just that --- making sure that every time I make a mail someone would profit, then overwhelme it with nonsense untill finaly when people see my name, they will think of usarenders vandalising --- Get that picture so to say,of usarenders decade old obsessed vandalism .

Just to make sure it will be allmost impossible to find the funds to do what everyone asked, the scale models. But now I go off-topic I guess, as the last thing I want to do, is to conform into that ramapage, conform with that way of thinking and tread a fellow artist.

But there are just one of the problems here -- as when you read how I answer usarender, you maybe forget what a pest this guy and his predesessors has been , in fact I think "jeanerettes" cot present as soon as usarender turned up, could easily be one and same person a person with a --- well here it come again, but it seem to be the truth --- pervert obsession to harm one particular fellow artist.
And you then read my words towerds usarender or Jeanneret and maybe forget, forget how this one particular obsessed person for a decade has done every, and I mean every dirty trick ,from posting dirty prvate mails to try collect a crowd , just anything this guy tried. and why.

Becaurse he is payed to do it, maybe . He cirtainly point to some influencial friends of his and please think about it -- the royalities when I mentioned those and how many architects allready triec mimic some of 3dh's genuine experssions , made usarender realy furious ; "how could Per Corell expect credits for his silli 3dh that anyone know do not work, so why shuld any architect who use it pay any credit at all".

But back to buisness , realy there isn't much buisness to get back to , and when you read the vendetta you will not wonder why.
P.C.
millennium club
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Denmark

Postby Landy » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

I simply can't believe you guys spend all this time writing up this messages. It is not the end of the world all of us should calm down. What's this "Ego clash forum", P.C. may god be with you and if I hurt your feelings I am sorry. Your art is simply the best artistic axpression on this and other website forum.
Kevin Mathews where are you?
Last edited by Landy on Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Landy
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:20 pm

Postby P.C. » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:08 am

Landy , I don't think anyone has to play the game as this game are set up.
I hope you see my point, why shuld anyone be forced to pick a side, to proselyt one participant before another , we are here to inspire eachother not to play games forced upon us, -- but I am sure you agrea to that.
P.C.
millennium club
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Denmark

PC is destroying this forum by harassing every topic created

Postby usarender » Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:32 pm

There we have it, forum members supporting those who are jerking around. These guys are free to upload hundreds of images in their galleries, with no apparent limit, and others of us who wish to upload samples of our designs and works are being blocked by the system, with a message "your 2 MB upload limit has been reached." Then, they accuse us of using only words and having nothing significant to contribute other then cheap words. These cheap words artists are full of themselves as well, posting their slander, lies and harassing other forum members in continuous streams of abuse. They are like in character and carry the common thread - they all are one in the same in being crude, rude with other forum members. Then, they join to support each other. No surprise. Birds of the same feather flock together, as the saying goes. All along this one particular guy has a grudge against me and is adamant now about supporting PC, his 3DH and now his Silver Screen, for no other reason then to try to piss others off. In the past, he was very critical of 3DH and PC stuff, and now, to be spiteful and irritating to others, supports this Schtuff just to try to tick off other forum members who have been critical of the same. It is nothing but a game.

Why was the silver screen moved to the Fireside forum in the first place ? Because obviously it does not belong in the architecture forum. The same with this topic created - it does not belong in the architecture forum.

Now, we have no criticism to make of other artists. This is absurd to even suggest, and another distortion of the facts. I have art work myself I have produced and would like to post. But certainly, try to post it in this architecture forum and see what happens.

It is clear this PC has a big ego, wishes to harm usarender, slander his image and ruin his every post. This has been his tactics from the beginning. He proceeds to elaborate hundreds of lies about me, as any fool would do when challenged, simply because I have demonstrated his 3DH is full of holes. He claims I am vandalizing, and he is the big vandal, trying to make sure every time someone sees one of my posts, they will come across his lies, his harassment, his false claims and see his attempts to ridicule me, and think this PC and usarender are wacky and harassing each other..... This PC continues with his lies, false claims, abusive behavior and harassment of usarender, in an attempt to destroy his image, simply because, as a devil, he if furious and cannot stand to have anyone challenge his 3DH and demonstrate it is full of holes. Then he continues with his incessant harassment, lies, speaking against usarender, then going back to promoting his wonderful 3DH and marvelous Silver Screen Gallery. This PC is full of it.

PC claims he answers, he never answers questions and points people bring up about his 3DH. He is a big lier and continues to slander other forum members and deceive everyone, promoting fanatically and incessantly his 3DH and Silver Screen schtuff. This guy is a coward, a pervert, a lier, a slanderer and harasser. He is obsessed with harming usarender and slander at every opportunity he gets. PC the big lier and slander machine. This guy is playing dirty games and has not learned his lesson even after being banned for four days from these forums because of his behavior.

He claims --

" forget how this one particular obsessed person for a decade has done every, and I mean every dirty trick ,from posting dirty private mails to try collect a crowd , just anything this guy tried....."

Another big lie by 3DH. He goes on creating lies. He claims I have been harassing him by e-mails for 10 years. This is a lie. I have never sent him ONE e-mail.

"Just anything he tried" - PC goes on with his lies and slandering, just because I have challenged his 3DH.

"Because he is payed to do it, maybe " - Another lie by PC. He contrives HUNDREDS of lies his fancy imagination contrives, not based on fact, but based on his cynical, darkened, foolish mind that contrives wicked scheming and lies about other forum members, as the worst demon would do. This PC is a type of FORUM DEMON, and he continues with his slandering, harassment and lies. Who wants now to support a forum demon? I certainly do not and never will support this guy, who is on the border of insanity.

And now PC tries to paint a bad picture of usarender, to make it look like now I am the bad guy, and he is the good guy, and because he has a marvelous Silver Screen Gallery and even more fantastic 3DH, everyone should pay tribute to Per Corell, and carry him along as a king, and everyone should deride usarender, who PC proceeds to slander and make hundreds of lies against usarender, simply because usarender has challenged his 3DH.

This PC never learns and is back to his foolish behavior, again.

Lies PC has made about me -->>

1. "You are not an architect".
2. "You are a coward."
3. "You have no vision".
4. "You are guilty of hate crimes".
5. "You have nothing to contribute to these forums".
6. "Your dirty mind".
7. "Your pervert".
8, "Your are paid to harass me".
9. "You want to steal the credits from me".
10. "You and your predecessors have been a pest to me".
11. "You have been harassing me for 10 years, in every way possible, even by e-mails".
12. "You and Jeanerette are the same person".
13. "You are trying to make a fool of language issues".
14. "You are fake".
15. "You have no argument".
16. Hundreds of other lies about me he has created.

As I have already demonstrated, his 3DH does not work as well.

3DH THE MARVEL OF THE CENTURY ?

PC 3DH CLAIMS-->>

1. 3DH made of sheet metal can be as strong as any structure and substitute many structural systems, being as good as steel columns, girders, H and T beams.

2. 3DH can be the new solution for the world, and solve the world's problems in housing for the poor.

3. PC is gaining world recognition and becoming the new hero, with his 3DH, and SILVER SCREEN GALLERY which are " advancing by leaps and bounds, getting hundreds of thousands of visitors." :)

4. "3DH is an optimized system and an ideal structure for every architect to used and to be applied to all buildings in the soon future."

5. " PC is a genious and the only true one to have anything original".

6. "PC is 20 years ahead of this time."

7. "PC is a nice guy".

8. "PC does not lie"

9. "PC does not harass "

10. "PC is not slandering anyone".

11. "PC is respected by the entire design community, as one of the most distinguished members". "His name will go down in history."

12. PC is being persecuted in his "Silver Screen Gallery".

AND, MANY FAKE STRUCTURAL CLAIMS. (See below).

Contrary to these claims, -->>

- PC has nothing to show to prove his thin 3DH skins of sheet metal will be as strong as steel beams and girders.

- PC never answers any QUESTIONS. He doesn't explain this 3DH is a way to be convincing. And nobody can understand his english.

- PC's only contributions ? A 3DH system ten years old, a gallery of graffiti with images projected and painted onto a wall, and hundreds of spam posts against every contribution of usarender and post on these forums, in continuous harassment.

PC has no new visionary thinking.

His structural Claims -->>

1. "3DH is as thick as H or T beams and therefore as strong as structural steel H and T Beams."

Forget it, will use too much steel to erect such a structure.

2. 3DH made of sheet metal can be as thick as T and H beams.

Sheet metal as thick as the strongest T and H beams ? Have you ever heard of vertical gravity?

Mr. Corel is the one being fake now, making false accusations and trying to fool everyone making false claims about me. He can go ahead, if he wants to get banned again.

WHAT PC HAS BEEN DOING, rather then proving 3DH -->>

1. Harassing other members.
2. Calling them names.
3. Demoralizing other forum members.
4. Turning every post into a fight.
5. Destroying posts of forum members by harassment.
6. Destroying ideas of other forum members by ridiculing them.


As I have demonstrated before, it is high time someone put this guy in line. His mind is big he is.

WHY 3DH IS NOT ADEQUATE AND PROPERLY DESIGNED, from an engineering point of view -->>

And why is 3DH not adequate to today's reality. Here is why -->>

3dh is not adequate in many ways as -->>

1. - Is was created by a boat builder that knows nothing of structural engineering.

2. - It will consume too much steel.

3. - PC has never produced any structural calculations to prove it works.

4. - It has never been built, is all theory.

5. - It is ten years old.

6. - It is nothing more then a nice series of matrix calculations, performed by a computer program, that distributes a structural grid into volumes, filling every space with it's "3dh" structural members that transverse the spaces in every direction. And it provides no structural details with calculations. It is all theoretical.

7. - Further, such transversing of spaces is cumbersome, it gets in the way, it creates interior spaces that are not free of structural members, but rather punched in every direction by these 3dh structural members, thus creating a need to resolve hundreds of interior spaces, and also creating many nooks and crannies in the corners, that one must now deal with. Interesting to note that your behavior has done the same. You have poked into every nook and cranny of these discussions, creating now problems to resolve. Your 3DH is consistent with your behavior on these forums.

8. - 3DH is difficult to build in practice, to set-up a production line to actually manufacture it.

9. - There are hundreds of alternate systems out there designed by some of the world's greatest engineers, and you expect designers to play around with this 3dh like a bunch of monkeys dangling around in a world of uncertainty, hanging from the conceptual beams of a structure never built before ? Monkey games.....

10. - It is being promoted by a madman who accuses and slanders others.

Further, -->>

11. PC cannot decide what material to use to produce 3DH. First, he is adamant about sheet metal, now he is not SO CERTAIN.

FURTHER REASONS --->>
posted also by me on another occasion in another post, placed here for all to see now -->>

1. Sheet metal is not so environmentally friendly as PC claims.

2. I have not seen any structural calculations to show how sheet metal composed in tubes or square profiles this way would be able to replace steel girders. I have not seen anything to convince they will carry huge loads. This is absurd to assume thin sections of steel plates will be able to replace heavy steel girders.

3. His system cannot be easily fire-proofed.

4. It is absurd to assume 3dh is a all out solution for all architecture and to keep bombing these forums insisting it is the only way. Architects design in different ways and opt from different structural systems based on the materials chosen, and the design. To assume 3dh would replace all structural systems is ludicrous. Those as the Architect who have entered into these games do this to their own detriment, and this also is folly.

5. It is nothing more then a nice structure for boats and planes but truly architects would not like to be locked into allowing a structure to form a backbone of everything they design.

6. His 3dh terminology is quite humorous. A 3d honey comb ? So he got the ideas from bees? And why "3d" honey comb? Why even the word 3D? Any architecture is 3d, so why specify 3d for this?

7. To try to apply 3dh to many of the designs I posted earlier in the topic of history in architecture, for example, or to many other designs would seriously limit those designs and the selection of materials would not match. One system cannot simply be expected to provide a solution to all designs. You cannot substitute a well designed brick building for 3DH.

8. Has anyone ever tried to do any calculation of on-site time that would be needed for cnc cutters to cut all those profiles for huge structures? It would not make for an efficient work site. Even if they were pre cut, and brought to the site, many many elements and some even small would all need to be numbered and placed in stacks in a way they could be easily found. It would create an enormous organizational task. And not to mention even the task of assembling them together. Would they be welded at joints? This would be a huge amount of work. And how are the steel plates joined on ends to form girders? The ends are welded as well? Too much work. As they say, "too much sugar for a dime."

9. We cannot simply rely heavily on sheet metal in the same way we cannot rely heavily on brick. How much energy is needed to extract the material, produce the sheet metal and deliver it to the site?

10. To allow computers to simply automatically distribute a system of structural members in a framework leads to design limitations as well. Buildings designed this way would be seriously restricted in certain aspects, as the structural grids would be dominant and thus certain areas could not be simply open or have large open spans, but would rather be consumed by multi-directional grids of structure. In large structures, it would lead to many cavity time spaces and even small structural corners and elements that would seem to hang in space. Therefore, complete control of the variation of architectural features possible by mixing structural systems would not be possible. Thus, the architecture would be determined to a degree by the structural system, and the range of architectural options would thus be diminished accordingly. If you cannot see this, I will need to explain further. It is quite obvious to me.

11. To assume 3dh could be easily assembled in poor African countries with no computers, no cnc cutters, no sheet metal is somewhat absurd. Many poor countries do not have ready access to computers or a machine to assemble structures.

12. 3dh was developed at the start of the 3d thing and of computers. It is then, somewhat outdated in terms of the way we design today with computers and what they are capable of doing in terms of calculations. It is a nice computer code of calculations that distributes structural elements in a grid using algorythms of matrix calculations, but is quite a simple system actually and designed at the time when autocad and other programs were quite limited. At the time, it was a nice development, but in practice is not such a uniform system for all types of design, as shown.

13. There are many other reasons as well. Does PC really want to know? As soon as I tell him, he is back to harassing and slandering me, rather then responding in a rational way.


23 REASONS AND MORE WHY 3DH IS A POOR SYSTEM.

THE TRUE PC -->>>

He now feels he is an expert in structures, in architecture, in debate on these forums, and proceeds to criticize others and ridicule their ways of posting and vision. This is an arrogant attitude he has. He never cares to engage in any meaningful discussion. Rather, he bombs all topics that are completely unrelated with promotion of his 3dh system.

He goes off on tangents and thinks everyone is persecuting his thinking and suggests others say things that they do not even say, and then he starts defending himself against his own shadow and against things nobody even said, that he imagines in his dirty mind.

In the past I may have had some respect for this guy, but now no longer, seeing the true PC come through in his filthy behavior and how he is quick to ridicule my every chain of posts . When I saw how he began to furiously oppose the ways I desire to engage discussion, and to compose posts. Who is this guy to criticize me for posting any material I wish to post? Or to criticize the method I have chosen to present topics of interest?

PC HARASSING THE DC with his continuous promoting of 3DH

This PC guy is really full of himself. Now I have to admit the truth. This 3dh system of his is quite irrelevant and full of technical problems even if one wished to implement it. It is all theory, and makes for a nice online game of discussion and no more..... those architects who are discussing it certainly will never implement it themselves.... I don't know why or how nobody else has seen this. It is time to speak my mind. His system is full of holes. it is high time he admit it and stop pushing a system like this in every thread on these posts. If people truly believed it was feasible, they would or could post a response here on why they feel 3dh is in fact a good system. I doubt anyone will do this, as simply, it is not a system that can hold water in practice. There are many technical problems with it's implementation.

Another problem is that this guy is not willing to work with anyone on anything. He works alone, and even if someone comes along to try to make 3dh work, and help fix it's problems, he is not willing to listen and work with others. Rather, he insists on that his solution is a marvel of technology and a solution for all architecture and the most beautiful system ever designed. He proceeds to ridicule my ideas, ways of posting and desire to participate in the ideas of others. This is completely unjustified. His arrogant attitude has led now to this situation. I am not the type of person he wants to start opposing. PC has already been banned once, this last week. So it is time he learn a lesson now and stop harassing others.

SUMMARY OF A FEW PROBLEMS WITH 3DH -->>

I have already pointed out what is wrong with that system as you posted in that image above. -->>

1. Small structural modules at corners that do not make sense. There are as remnants of a grid laid out by a computer.

2. A complex system of angles and pieces that would create un necessary assembly complexities.

3. A system of pieces of sheet metal that are difficult to assemble together, to weld, to create the joints.

4. A structure that could be easily achieved by starndard construction systems.

5. A maze of pieces that are not necessary to make the structure stand.

6. A maze of remnant unnecessary pieces.

7. Simply, a structure that may make sense for a boat, but why does it need to be designed this way for a building?

The problem is, he keeps posting a particular same image on this forum, asking everyone what is wrong with it, with his 3DD, and nobody cares to respond. Perhaps I was the first to attempt to respond to it in a logical way.

Then he expects me to deliver a structural system that works with solids or computer programs.

PC is the one who should provide the calculations, not me.

PC FALSE CLAIMS

He claims I am trying to make a fool of language issues.

I am not trying to make a fool of language issues. It is PC who has attempted to make a fool of me, by criticizing the way I choose to compose posts and place material online for discussion. He does not see this. It is his myopia of thinking he is the only right, and who has been attempting to ridicule me. He started this, not me.

Recently, after two months of peace and quiet, he came back to harass me again, out of the blue. Then suddenly he gets banned. Now he is back again at it.

Now, this PC asked for sincerity and objective analysis of this 3dh thing? It is you he who should provide the objective answers and structural calculations to prove it works, not me.

PC OBSESSION WITH SPAMMING AND HARASSING OF EVERY POST

I am not obsessed with harming others. It is PC who is reverting to insanity. He is obsessed with spamming and harming every post I place online. Then he complains about a little flack in his "Silver Screen Gallery"? He doesn't respect the posts of other members then expects others to respect his posts and ideas? His imagination is creating fantasies in his mind. Stop imagining things PC. And stop criticizing the way I post and harassing my every post.

Now, if this guy feels I am harming him, is it that his system is not able to stand up to criticism? If it is, please give objective responses, not emotional responses, please. He must then just prove what he has to say, any not simply resort to retoric, false accusations, lies, spamming of other member posts, harassment, and dirty games of tarnishing the image of others, as he has done in his wicked lies and scheming.

I can see that the problem has been, all these years, that everyone can see these problems, but everyone is being kind and does not wish to offend this system PC has been so obsessed in defending. He even got his "3DH" term named within the possible structural systems on this forum, somehow.

After being banned and warned, he is back to it again, and has come back like a dog with his tail between his legs " It is my fault, it is that I didn't realize that some people don't have the stomach to take it, as I do". This is neither an apology, nor an admission of wrong doing. It is a statement of pride, that he should have realized, before fighting, that others do not have the balls he does, to take the fighting. This is an unacceptable response by PC, after being banned.

ARCHITECTS BEING FOOLED

And the architects who may have come along recently, apparently attempting to rescue such system, are doing so only as a way to go along in the game.... if they really had balls, they would implement it themselves, rather then produce nice computer graphics, proposing their are adopting 3dh as a pet, when in reality down deep inside, everyone knows they would not get even near 3DH in real practice, nor would they every implement it in their architecture. They are, as SDR has shown, just playing the game. This 3DH is nothing but a computer game, a PC GAME.

Now, I myself had up to a certain point been defending this 3dh things, and was also fooled, and even proposed many ways to improve it (foolishness as I also was doped and fooled by PC). I can't believe I had actually been fooled as well, as the fancy graphics looked so nice.

Now, however, that I have analyzed it more objectively, and have demonstrated it's problems, I have changed by mind, I have realized it is a failure. It is a poor system. I have demonstrated more then 25 reasons why!

JUST DEMONSTRATE 3DH MAKES SENSE and stop the harassment!

Rather then demonstrating how 3D makes sense, or to prove so, PC goes on painting his ugly pictures of me, trying to ridicule me and the way I post. He is full of contradictions in his behavior. One day at one time he was "friendly", or pretentiously appeared to be so, and yet the next day je started to ridicule my style of engaging discussion and of posting topics of interest. And now he cannot see it is he who is the source of this dis agreement.

THE NICE GUY?

Now, PC claims to have met many "nice" guys, and also claim he is a "nice guy", then he claims I am not a "nice guy", simply because I wish to analyze this 3dh thing in an objective way.

PC is the one who is not the nice guy, for hundreds of reasons. He now proceeds to ridicule me on many occasions, and ridicule the way I have chosen to post topics, referring to it as a "copy and paste". PC is the one copying and pasting the same images over and over again on these forums, these images of his 3dh. He copies and pastes the same comments that come to his mind on 3dh, in a desperate attempt to promote it, even at 2 or 3 in the morning, frantically trying to save 3DH from sinking. He keeps reverting back to the same thinking, painting pictures of others as " Nazi persecuters", "PC haters" , "nice guy haters" and on and on he goes ... I pity these people, these PC's of life....and he is quite predictable.... and at times, illogical, emotional, fearful of his own shadow.... with wild imaginations of flying lights and visions, at times on the border of madness and insanity.

A NEED TO BE TRANSLATED IN A MORE CLEAR LANGUAGE ?

The Chinese, they couldn't understand the english and needed it translated for them, entirely missing the point I have made.

And yes, this PC deserves to be sued for LIBEL AND SLANDER - Mr. Corell, for all his lies, personal abuse and attacks. If he continues in his behavior, it will happen.

What a joke is this PC and his 3DH is nothing new.

he has provided no evidence, no structural calculations to prove 3DH works.

A BOAT BUILDER brings the marvel of the century.

Rather, it is a system designed by a boat builder, an artisan craftsman who believes now his structure is stronger then hell and can support anything. He laughs, mocks and scoffs, lies, accuses, and even after being banned has not learned his lesson.

FALSE CLAIMS, ACCUSATIONS MADE BY PC --->>

Hundreds of lies he is spreading about me in his false claims he has made about me. A few of the hundreds of false statements by PC about me --->>

"You not an architect"
"You are not an artist"
"You lie"
"You don't understand 3dh"
"You are fake"
"You make vain complaints"
"You have nothing to contribute"
"You have no argument"
"You have no visionary thinking"
"You have no true vision"
"You have not innovation"
"You dirty mind"
"You pervert"

And HUNDREDS of other false complaints, deceptive comments and slandering statements PC has made against me in the last few months, in an unending spam against my every post on the forums.

He even created THREE SEPARATE TOPIC INTENDED SOLEY TO SLANDER ME --- >> "Let us tell who we are" and usarender, who he is and what he has done, and "what happened to this great forum" ? Beyond his hundreds of posts attacking me, in many many topics in this forum, in his continuous, relentless attempt to ridicule, slander, harass and degrade my image on these forums.

Now, after so much harassment, defaming, slander and false accusations against me, inevitable, I must defend myself publicly since this madman has attacked me publicly with his lies. Therefore, in response, contrary to what he claims. --->>

- I AM an architect.
- I AM an artist.
- I do have much to contribute and and still contributing to the growth of these forums, placing some of the most well researched, thought-out and visited posts in these communities.

-I do have visionary thinking. I have elaborated hundreds of new ideas, new systems, new inventions, contrary to what you claim. I am a visionary, contrary to your false claims.

AND HERE IS A LIST OF THE FORUM TOPICS PC HAS DESTROYED BY HARASSING USARENDER, IN HIS DARK ATTEMPT TO TARNISH AND DESTROY MY IMAGE -->>

PC Games Chapter I

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... hp?t=18981

PC Games Chapter II

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... &start=255

PC Games Chaper III

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... &start=255

PC Games Chapter IV

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... &start=210

PC Games Chapter V

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... 4&start=60

PC Games Chapter VI

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... 0&start=60

PC Games Chapter VII

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... 9&start=45

PC Games Chapter VIII

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... &start=135

PC Games Chapter IX

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... hp?t=19356

PC Games Chapter X

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... &start=135

PC Games Chapter XI

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... hp?t=18980

PC Games Chapter XII

http://www.designcommunity.com/forums/v ... 1&start=15

and many others.....unending complaints and harassment by PC, on every conceivable and possible topic. He will be there to harass and destroy the discussion topic, and lie about usarender.

A NEED TO IMPROVE THESE FORUMS by improving the quality of member participation.

I was and have been dedicating many many hours to place well composed topics to help others in their posts, doing research and thinking much on several topics and many of my posts were being very much appreciated by various members. Suddenly some ill intended individuals start harassing me, creating lies and then complains about being banned. And then, they try to get me banned in the process. I am being harassed, and now they are trying to ban me to? Now, who is creating all this after all ?

I will continue to compose well thought out ideas, visions, systems and seek for the betterment of this forum, with some of the most well thought out posts. I am only seeking to protect this design community to make it a better place. I have composed hundreds of posts that have gained much recognition for being well researched, well elaborated, insightful and continuously seek to help other forum members with their ideas, their posts and conduct a substantial amount of research for them, to help them develop further their topics and in their areas of interest. I am continuously seeking also new members who have ideas, visions but who do not know how to materialize them. I create new inventions for them, new ideas and systems so they can materialize their visions. All this to help these people and help the community be a better place.
Last edited by usarender on Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
usarender
millennium club
 
Posts: 1254
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:22 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Postby usarender » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:01 pm

And my other post on this subject to analyze this system of 3DH for it's validity -->>

The author of this 3DH claims it is a sort of MARVEL OF THE CENTURY. Is it really ?

PC 3DH CLAIMS-->>

1. 3DH made of sheet metal can be as strong as any structure and substitute many structural systems, being as good as steel columns, girders, H and T beams.

2. 3DH can be the new solution for the world, and solve the world's problems in housing for the poor.

3. PC is gaining world recognition and becoming the new hero, with his 3DH, which is " advancing by leaps and bounds." :)

4. "3DH is an optimized system and an ideal structure for every architect to used and to be applied to all buildings in the soon future."

5. " PC is a genious and the only true one to have anything original".

6. "PC is 20 years ahead of this time."

AND, MANY STRUCTURAL CLAIMS. (See below).

Contrary to these claims, -->>

- PC has nothing to show to prove his thin 3DH skins of sheet metal will be as strong as steel beams and girders.

- PC never answers any QUESTIONS. He doesn't explain this 3DH is a way to be convincing. And nobody can understand his english.

His structural Claims -->>

1. "3DH is as thick as H or T beams and therefore as strong as structural steel H and T Beams."

Forget it, will use too much steel to erect such a structure.

2. 3DH made of sheet metal can be as thick as T and H beams.

Sheet metal as thick as the strongest T and H beams ? Have you ever heard of vertical gravity?

WHY 3DH IS NOT ADEQUATE AND PROPERLY DESIGNED, from an engineering point of view -->>

And why is 3DH not adequate to today's reality. Here is why -->>

3dh is not adequate in many ways as -->>

1. - Is was created by a boat builder that knows nothing of structural engineering.

2. - It will consume too much steel.

3. - PC has never produced any structural calculations to prove it works.

4. - It has never been built, is all theory.

5. - It is ten years old, and alternate systems are already on their way into the market, that have actually been built.

6. - It is nothing more then a nice series of matrix calculations, performed by a computer program, that distributes a structural grid into volumes, filling every space with it's "3dh" structural members that transverse the spaces in every direction. And it provides no structural details with calculations. It is all theoretical.

7. - Further, such transversing of spaces is cumbersome, it gets in the way, it creates interior spaces that are not free of structural members, but rather punched in every direction by these 3dh structural members, thus creating a need to resolve hundreds of interior spaces, and also creating many nooks and crannies in the corners, that one must now deal with. Interesting to note that your behavior has done the same. You have poked into every nook and cranny of these discussions, creating now problems to resolve. Your 3DH is consistent with your behavior on these forums.

8. - 3DH is difficult to build in practice, to set-up a production line to actually manufacture it.

9. - There are hundreds of alternate systems out there designed by some of the world's greatest engineers, and you expect designers to play around with this 3dh like a bunch of monkeys dangling around in a world of uncertainty, hanging from the conceptual beams of a structure never built before ? Monkey games.....

Further, -->>

11. The author of 3DH cannot decide what material to use to produce 3DH. First, he is adamant about sheet metal, now he is not SO CERTAIN.

FURTHER REASONS --->>
posted also by me on another occasion in another post, placed here for all to see now -->>

1. Sheet metal is not so environmentally friendly as PC claims.

2. I have not seen any structural calculations to show how sheet metal composed in tubes or square profiles this way would be able to replace steel girders. I have not seen anything to convince they will carry huge loads. This is absurd to assume thin sections of steel plates will be able to replace heavy steel girders.

3. His system cannot be easily fire-proofed.

4. It is absurd to assume 3dh is a all out solution for all architecture and to keep bombing these forums insisting it is the only way. Architects design in different ways and opt from different structural systems based on the materials chosen, and the design. To assume 3dh would replace all structural systems is ludicrous. Those as the Architect who have entered into these games do this to their own detriment, and this also is folly.

5. It is nothing more then a nice structure for boats and planes but truly architects would not like to be locked into allowing a structure to form a backbone of everything they design.

6. His 3dh terminology is quite humorous. A 3d honey comb ? So he got the ideas from bees? And why "3d" honey comb? Why even the word 3D? Any architecture is 3d, so why specify 3d for this?

7. To try to apply 3dh to many of the designs I posted earlier in the topic of history in architecture, for example, or to many other designs would seriously limit those designs and the selection of materials would not match. One system cannot simply be expected to provide a solution to all designs. You cannot substitute a well designed brick building for 3DH.

8. Has anyone ever tried to do any calculation of on-site time that would be needed for cnc cutters to cut all those profiles for huge structures? It would not make for an efficient work site. Even if they were pre cut, and brought to the site, many many elements and some even small would all need to be numbered and placed in stacks in a way they could be easily found. It would create an enormous organizational task. And not to mention even the task of assembling them together. Would they be welded at joints? This would be a huge amount of work. And how are the steel plates joined on ends to form girders? The ends are welded as well? Too much work. As they say, "too much sugar for a dime."

9. We cannot simply rely heavily on sheet metal in the same way we cannot rely heavily on brick. How much energy is needed to extract the material, produce the sheet metal and deliver it to the site?

10. To allow computers to simply automatically distribute a system of structural members in a framework leads to design limitations as well. Buildings designed this way would be seriously restricted in certain aspects, as the structural grids would be dominant and thus certain areas could not be simply open or have large open spans, but would rather be consumed by multi-directional grids of structure. In large structures, it would lead to many cavity time spaces and even small structural corners and elements that would seem to hang in space. Therefore, complete control of the variation of architectural features possible by mixing structural systems would not be possible. Thus, the architecture would be determined to a degree by the structural system, and the range of architectural options would thus be diminished accordingly. If you cannot see this, I will need to explain further. It is quite obvious to me.

11. To assume 3dh could be easily assembled in poor African countries with no computers, no cnc cutters, no sheet metal is somewhat absurd. Many poor countries do not have ready access to computers or a machine to assemble structures.

12. 3dh was developed at the start of the 3d thing and of computers. It is then, somewhat outdated in terms of the way we design today with computers and what they are capable of doing in terms of calculations. It is a nice computer code of calculations that distributes structural elements in a grid using algorythms of matrix calculations, but is quite a simple system actually and designed at the time when autocad and other programs were quite limited. At the time, it was a nice development, but in practice is not such a uniform system for all types of design, as shown.


23 REASONS AND MORE WHY 3DH IS A POOR SYSTEM.

SUMMARY OF A FEW PROBLEMS WITH 3DH -->>

I have already pointed out what is wrong with the 3dH system that PC has posted several times in one particular image of what appears could be a church or the like. -->>

1. Small structural modules at corners that do not make sense. There are as remnants of a grid laid out by a computer.

2. A complex system of angles and pieces that would create un necessary assembly complexities.

3. A system of pieces of sheet metal that are difficult to assemble together, to weld, to create the joints.

4. A structure that could be easily achieved by starndard construction systems.

5. A maze of pieces that are not necessary to make the structure stand.

6. A maze of remnant unnecessary pieces.

7. Simply, a structure that may make sense for a boat, but why does it need to be designed this way for a building?

The problem is, he keeps posting a particular same image on this forum, asking everyone what is wrong with it, with his 3DH mumble jumbo, and nobody cares to respond. Perhaps I was the first to attempt to respond to it in a logical way.

Then he expects others to do the calculations and prove 3DH does not work.

PC is the one who should provide the calculations, not others. This he refuses to do.

A NEED TO BE TRANSLATED IN A MORE CLEAR LANGUAGE ?

The Chinese, they couldn't understand the english and needed it translated for them, entirely missing the point I have made.

A BOAT BUILDER brings the marvel of the century.

Rather, it is a system designed by a boat builder, an artisan craftsman who believes now his structure is stronger then hell and can support anything.

A NEED TO IMPROVE THESE FORUMS by improving the quality of member participation.

I was and have been dedicating many many hours to place well composed topics to help others in their posts, doing research and thinking much on several topics and many of my posts were being very much appreciated by various members.

I will continue to compose well thought out ideas, visions, systems and seek for the betterment of this forum, with some of the most well thought out posts. I am only seeking to protect this design community to make it a better place. I have composed hundreds of posts that have gained much recognition for being well researched, well elaborated, insightful and continuously seek to help other forum members with their ideas, their posts and conduct a substantial amount of research for them, to help them develop further their topics and in their areas of interest. I am continuously seeking also new members who have ideas, visions but who do not know how to materialize them. I create new inventions for them, new ideas and systems so they can materialize their visions. All this to help these people and help the community be a better place.
usarender
millennium club
 
Posts: 1254
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:22 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Postby usarender » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:12 pm

3DH, the Marvel of the Century ?

PC to Be Heralded as the King of 3DH ?

The Silver Screen Rules as the Queen and 3DH as the King. Come on PC.

Further, nobody will conceive of producing every conceivable piece of architecture or building structure only out of steel. To apply steel on such a large universal scale is not an environmentally friendly solution, it would use to much energy to produce and recycle, carry to the site on such a large global scale, and where supply is scarce and far away, and where the material is not as readily accessible, as in poor countries. Then you now refer to some 3D mass calculation of autocad also. That is the best pc can do. Pull up some off the shelf autocad program, spin a few mass computations on it and voila !. PC is basing all this on some autocad function of mass calculation. Now, it is very easy to take a standard autocad program and run it on your 3DH and get a mass volume equivalent to other buildings, but this does not prove anything or that your 3DH is properly designed. It does not even resolve the many problems I have pointed out. It does not prove the dimensions are correct or that 3DH is better then any other system. It simply does not prove anything. Compared to what in any event ? Compared to a wood structure? You expect now all architects to be fooled and design everything with your 3DH, consuming huge quantities of steel around the world, in hundreds of projects using your 3DH system of mass steel consumption ? This is my point PC, wake up. Wood can be subjected to reflorestation efforts and is renewable, like other more natural renewable materials, if the program is properly handled, but steel exacts a huge toll on the environment, from extraction, to processing, to site delivery, to assembly. It is convenient for many applications, but cannot be accepted as a universal standard of construction for all structures. It simply, has it's place. Architects pick and choose at will freely from a multitude of structural systems, as they see fit, and will not bend over nor kiss the rear end of 3DH. What this PC claims can be claimed by anyone, particularly by those who are not architects and who continue to deceive others with their false claims and allegations. What do we have also of hundreds of new renewable materials, products and systems out there that PC makes a fool of and ignores ? He keeps proclaiming his 3DH is on top of all of those, more BS.

These 3DH theoretical arguments go on and on. It is nothing but nice computer graphics, fancy 3D models and theory. 3DH may consume an average amount of steel, on the individual job, but as a construction system to be applied over and over to all types of structures, as he suggests, including housing for the poor, and as a new standard to substitute any building technology, or able to re-create any master of architecture piece, as any Frank Lloyd Wright house, is BS. I am speaking of 3DH consuming to much steel on a global application level, not in your individual theoretical models, can't you see it ?

and other forum members have also rebuked PC for his behavior, and for creating topics to slander others, but he still has not learned his lesson, even after being banned for four days from this design community. Now he is back again to attempt to destroy others.

This guy will never stop harassing the topics on this forum and promoting his 3DH and Silver Screen Gallery ALL OVER THE PLACE.

And further -->>

SDR wrote:Per,...that doesn't let you off the hook: his list of questions and criticisms is the most complete and comprehensive one -- and, in case you can't or won't see it, those questions are echoed in one way or another by almost EVERY SERIOUS VIEWER OF FANCY GRAPHICS SINCE THE BEGINNING.

Numbers of viewers doesn't necessarily equal number of those who agree with you. The vast proportion of responses to you has been questioning. Could there be a good reason for this, Per ? Can you accept that in fact you have failed to answer, have evaded perfectly reasonable questions, again and again, about 3DH -- while insisting you have in fact answered them ? You hve readily insulted those who made an honest attempt to make sure they understood what you were proposing.

When pushed to the wall by the contest kindly arranged on another board, you for the first time addressed the possible need for additional bracing, for instance. Are you aware that all previous attempts by many readers to get some recognition of this issue were avoided by you ? Is this honest and forthcoming ? Never before this did the concept -- or even the mention -- of skins, and their possible structural contribution, appear in your posts. Suddenly we've entered the realm of semi-stressed skin design. Better late than never ?


Of all your readers, I believe I am the only one who tried to understand your thinking about the implications of 3DH by ACTUALLY DRAWING SOMETHING MYSELF, and posting it, to see if I was on the same track as you.

If the past is any indication, you will read this hastily, fail to understand what I said, and launch into another tirade -- angrily, in garbled English.

It's just so sad. . .and boring.

SR


and -->>

SDR wrote:Would it kill you to pick up a pencil and draw a few things, to explain the system you seem to have so clearly (?) in mind ?

Or does it have to be projected in order for you to draw it ? Can you use a straightedge and a pencil ? Most artists and designers and architects and engineers draw, to explain themselves. Is that beneath the "humble nice guy artist" who claims so much for his invention ?

C'mon, Per -- put up or shut up. It's been a long and painful three years and four months -- nineteen pages and thousands of words (most of them wasted, apparently, to get us only this far). Why claim the moon for a pretty idea ? Couldn't you see you'd get caught by falling in live with your own "child" and making fanciful, unsupportable and arrogant claims for it ?

A bullshitter -- no matter how artistic -- isn't going to get much respect, particulary among people who make their living providing a service that depends on integrity and safety. I think architects and their kind are at least as open to new thinking as the average person, so its doubly insulting to accuse them of not appreciating a genuine innovation. And that's just what you have done, over and over.

Can't you see that ?

SDR


TO WHICH PC RESPONDED -->>

P.C. wrote:Exactly , and generaly I do not disagrea beside I apriaciate you find it worth to spend your efford.
I think recursive programming -- that's as you know what is behind most modern blob structure generation is one way to bring generative building structures further. Sort of asking myself I can't see anything to hinder that --- what it would bring, how it would look or where it would go wrong , that I cn't answere and maybe it's a wild goose but, basicly it will change something as 3dh compleatly --- if it could be implamented something I think it can, but how ...
And maybe it would mean to change the basic idea in 3dh , but That I guess is the sacrifise you has to be willing to do . Still main trouble I guess with 3dh is , that much dameage is done that if I want to complete the esperiments and stretch it to the limits, then that cost money. Usarender know that .

But thank for adding a real comment and spending your time, realy all I ever wanted, has been to profit anyone kind of spark a more open and productive community.


Now, as he sees the cracks starting to appear in his 3DH, he claims he is open to change. This, to avoid 3DH from collapsing altogether. Now that PC realizes 3DH is a bad system, he wants to change it, and incorporate my ideas and suggestions, and take the credit for it. He then pretends to be a nice guy, and to be open to suggestion and to change. This, another scheme he has devised to rob usarender of his ideas and suggestions on 3DH and then for him to take credit for it. Now he will rob all my suggestions I have given, design modifications proposed, and go on to give me no credit, but rather rob all my ideas and claims he re-designed 3DH. What a scammer. And he already claimed he had given up this 3DH thing, to go back to art work. Now, to save his image, he is willing to modify 3DH and steal usarender of all his ideas and suggestions, to try to build his own image back up as the prince of 3DH. Long ago I stopped believing in this guy now that realize what PC really is all about.

This is final proof that 3DH, all these years, was and is poorly designed, a bad system. Now, this person claims he is the creator of a new 3DH, which he developed by taking the systems and ideas from others and pouring it into his 3DH, giving nobody any credit but himself. And goes on to paint an image of himself as the nice guy, the guy open to change, to get sympathy and support. This, another of his PC Games of scheming and contriving, to maintain his image as the KING OF 3DH. King yes, the king kong of 3dh who must now steal the bananas from scientists and inventors, eat it, and show to the world his big 3DH belly, full of the bananas he ate. Hurrey to 3DH and the King Kong who rules ! :lol: :lol:

Go build the leaning tower of Pizza out of 3DH, while you are at, it, and then proceed to re-build the Great Wall of China and all of Frank Lloyd Wrignts masterpieces, as a start. :lol:
usarender
millennium club
 
Posts: 1254
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:22 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Postby P.C. » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:53 pm

Image

What is obvious is that today, it is not the old but the new possibilities with easy programs and cheap computers pictures not words , make an obvious answer.
P.C.
millennium club
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Denmark

Postby P.C. » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:02 pm

What is obvious to, is how no other structure are suggested , only a load of raging talking against a method that acturly do the job, no positive attitude, no wish to use the critic as critic is ment to be used ; to solve this great challance as good, and maybe even better , better than 3dh but untill not I has not seen anything but totaly freaked out obsession, sorry but tha't how I read it and realy, --- there are no suggestion for something better than 3dh there , is that the idea with critic just to use it as another plenty way of mudthrowing.
P.C.
millennium club
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Denmark

Postby usarender » Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 pm

And just, think I am one unique in 155,000 visitors - as after this many visitors to your posting, none has been able to challenge 3DH and survive the furry of PC, the community 3DH demon :evil: , except one - usarender.

So I am one in 155,000 and who is successfully ripping the seams ouf of 3DH, and the only to post a successful rebuttal of this theoretical system. :twisted:

The Fancy Graphics Ballooned Ego Post

Better Alternate Structural Systems

Th e Truth About PC and 3DH - PC Unmasked
usarender
millennium club
 
Posts: 1254
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:22 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Postby usarender » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:00 pm

O cara é um mala ruim. Alguem por aí ta curtindo a jogada? :lol:

Je parle un petit peu de francais. Parlez-vous anglais?

Vá toma no rabo seu metido !

Nós agora estamos na vanguarda do futuro, seus panacas. Voces já eram!

Quem acha que vocês são afinal ? Seus filhos da mãe ! :twisted:

:lol: :lol:
usarender
millennium club
 
Posts: 1254
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:22 am
Location: San Diego, Ca

Postby P.C. » Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:51 am

For anyone who is positive interested in the paintings and graphics at Silver Screen Galleri ;

Case you want to see a number of the best of these pictures please go to ;

www.ArtWanted.com/PC

I can suggest any one of you who has an interest in fine arts, painting and sketches to visit the site.
P.C.
millennium club
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Denmark

Previous

Return to DesignCommunity Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron

User Control Panel

Login

Who is online

In this forum zone there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 593 on Sat May 26, 2018 5:18 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchitectureWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Search
Special thanks to our sustaining subscribers Building Design UK, Building Design News UK, and Building Design Tenders UK.