Posted by gary veasy on February 18, 1999 at 22:27:42:
In Reply to: Re: p.s. posted by Peter Bacot on February 18, 1999 at 12:50:03:
Using RadOL, it would have to be supported by Artifice becasue a special file format is required and I think they have to physically write a Radiancedefinition for the material I believe.....just curious...The Image-cel people wont know I dont believe....
Artifice, are these "objects" that will render using RadOl or are they objects like phots that require special attention, perhaps via the new, uhm, pending, texture mapping capabilities of RadianceOL? Also, are these people and objects more refined than those on the DW cd? Comments appreciated!