Posted by Jacques Pochoy on February 19, 1999 at 01:12:22:
In Reply to: Re: Question on V2.0 Revisted posted by gary veasy on February 17, 1999 at 17:28:29:
I agree with Gary !
MiniCadd is a hell of a soft, sort of 19th century industrial process... Plumbing everywhere...Seems like a poorman's ArchiCad.
If you look for Booleans, for peculiar objects and bring them back in DW, I would suggest Zoom light from Abvent.
But I still hesitate bout Booleans as a way of working in 3D, I sent several months ago a small french soft, Exception, in the "spirit" of DW that don't use booleans either and you could achieve the same goals, with a "Hyper" function.
Many of my student just loved that soft, and I was hoping that DW 2.0 would be a mature, bugless and much more evolutive version of that.
I have changed my E-Mail and am so overwhelmed with work that I can't partipitate as I used to, but I DO follow the message board evry day....