Message - Re: masters programs/ theory

Responses | Students Forum | Architecture Forum | Architecture Scrapbook | ArchitectureWeek

Posted by  Will Hayes on June 28, 2002 at 14:05:22:

In Reply to:  masters programs/ theory posted by sara again on June 27, 2002 at 10:49:01:

Columbia, Harvard, & SCI-Arc all have reputations as being recently/currently on the 'cutting edge' of architectural theory & research. I would recommend them all as being exceptional schools, especially if an eduacation that's heavily theory-based is what you're after.

My school, Penn (which perhaps I should refer to as "The University of Pennsylvania" or "the GSFA" after some recent confusion on this board) is also very strong on theory, but has a decided slant towards material properties and concepts of fabrication and construction in the first year, as opposed to "pure theory".
For example: The very first studio exercise at Penn is usually something like designing and fabricating a full-scale joint, cladding for a body part, or container for an everyday object; whereas the first exercise at Columbia was something like choosing three animals, developing a system of categorization for them then relating them to one another.

Hope that helps.

ArchitectureWeek     Search     Buildings     Architects     Types     Places     Pix     Store     Books     Library

Search by name of Building, Architect, or Place:   
Examples:  "Fallingwater",  "Wright",  "Paris"           Advanced Search


Post a Response -




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Responses | DesignWorkshop 3D Forum | User Gallery | Architecture Forum | Scrapbook | E-Design

Special thanks to our Sustaining Subscribers including .

Home | Great Buildings | CAD Outpost | DesignWorkshop | Free 3D | Gallery | Support | Search | ArchitectureWeek
This document is provided for on-line viewing only. /students/3434.html